Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Market a-Twitter at IPO’s debut

Microblogg­ing site leaps 73% on 1st day; $1.82 billion raised

- SARAH FRIER AND LEE SPEARS

Twitter Inc. jumped 73 percent in its trading debut Thursday, as investors paid a premium for its promises of fast growth.

The stock rose to $44.90 at the close in New York from the initial public offering price of $26, delivering the biggest one-day pop for an IPO that raised more than $1 billion since Alibaba.com Ltd. debuted in 2007, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Twitter sold 70 million shares, raising $1.82 billion.

The microblogg­ing website picked a price that valued it higher than Facebook Inc. and still drew more interest than anticipate­d. The San Francisco-based company, which is unprofitab­le and has one-fifth as many users as Facebook, is benefiting from investors’ thirst for companies that will grow quickly in expanding markets such as mobile advertisin­g.

Twitter’s website and applicatio­ns let people post 140-character messages to friends and online followers.

“The company did everything to secure the most cash for itself while leaving some money for the IPO buyers,” said Josef Schuster, the founder of IPOX Schuster LLC, a Chicago-based man-

ager of about $1.9 billion. “You need a pop at the opening to leave a good taste with everyone. They did a pretty good job managing the whole situation.”

At the current price, Twitter is valued at $24.9 billion, or 22 times estimated 2014 sales of $1.14 billion, according to analyst projection­s compiled by Bloomberg. That compares with 11.2 times what Facebook traded at Thursday, and price-to-sales ratio of 11.7 for LinkedIn Corp.

Facebook shares fell 3.2 percent, and LinkedIn shares fell 4.2 percent Thursday. At its market debut in 2012, Facebook’s stock was flat, propped up by bankers, while LinkedIn’s more than doubled on the day it went public in 2011.

The pricing puts the onus on Twitter to deliver on its promises of fast growth after earlier pitching shares as low as $17. Chief Executive Officer Dick Costolo has rallied investor interest in Twitter’s rapid sales curve — with revenue more than doubling annually — even with no clear path to making a profit.

The company received orders for about 30 times as many shares as it offered at the $26 IPO price, a person with knowledge of the matter said. About 8 million of the shares, or 11 percent of the total in the IPO, were allocated to retail investors, the person said, asking not to be identified because the informatio­n is private. A typical retail allocation is 10 percent to 15 percent.

Still, any price over $40 reflects “hype” and makes Twitter too risky of an investment, said Jeffrey Sica, president and chief investment officer of Sica Wealth Management LLC in Morristown, N.J.

“I anticipate­d a very strong open, but when you start to approach these levels this is absolute froth,” he said. “There is nothing supporting this range. I think this is just way, way above what realistica­lly we should be considerin­g a stable open.”

Brian Wieser, an analyst at Pivotal Research Group in New York, downgraded Twitter to a sell rating with a $30 price target.

“If you’ve got it, sell it,” Wieser said in an interview. “If there are willing buyers who have a view of the business today that gets them comfortabl­e with this valuation then those people should hold it, but I can’t get there, and I’m not recommendi­ng my clients to hold it.”

CEO Costolo was at the New York Stock Exchange for the stock’s debut under the TWTR symbol, along with Chief Financial Officer Mike Gupta and co-founders Evan Williams, Biz Stone and Jack Dorsey.

Twitter’s $1.82 billion IPO is almost as much as the $1.9 billion that Google Inc. raised in its 2004 IPO and makes it the largest IPO by a U.S. technology company since Facebook’s debut in May 2012. Goldman Sachs Group Inc. led the sale, working with Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase & Co.

The price rise underscore­s how Twitter has so far sidesteppe­d some of the pitfalls that befell Facebook’s IPO last year. Facebook’s offering was marred by a trading snag on the Nasdaq Stock Market and investor backlash over its valuation. The company at the time was priced at 107 times trailing 12-month earnings on a fully diluted basis, making it more expensive than 99 percent of all companies in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. Facebook saw its stock quickly sink below its $38 debut price, a level it didn’t exceed until this August.

By contrast, Twitter decided to list on the New York Stock Exchange and chose Goldman Sachs to lead its offering, while Morgan Stanley led Facebook’s IPO. The company also sought to avoid hype by filing for an IPO secretly with the Securities and Exchange Commission and earlier setting a price range for its shares at a discount to competitor­s.

Twitter’s stock gain may erase some of the aftertaste of the Facebook, Zynga Inc. and Groupon Inc. IPOs, each of which lost half their value within six months of their debuts, sending a chill over consumer-technology IPOs and some Silicon Valley startup valuations.

Demand for Twitter’s stock exceeded the supply even before bankers started formally asking for orders, people familiar with the matter have said. On Monday, Twitter raised the proposed price range for the 70 million shares sold in the IPO to $23 to $25 each, up from the earlier range of $17 to $20.

“People are really looking all the way out to their 2015 and 2016 revenue estimates to price this,” said Larry Levine, a partner in financial-advisory firm McGladrey LLP in Chicago. “The risk to buying Twitter is if Twitter does not achieve its very lofty growth estimates.”

 ?? Bloomberg News/SCOTT EELLS ?? The Twitter logo is displayed on a banner outside the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday. Shares of the Internet social network company surged 70 percent Thursday in their first day of trading.
Bloomberg News/SCOTT EELLS The Twitter logo is displayed on a banner outside the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday. Shares of the Internet social network company surged 70 percent Thursday in their first day of trading.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States