Pakistani schools ban teen’s book
Officials say activist, shot by Taliban, represents West
ISLAMABAD — Pakistani education officials said Sunday that they have banned teenage activist Malala Yousafzai’s book from private schools across the country, claiming it doesn’t show enough respect for Islam and calling her a tool of the West.
Malala attracted global attention last year when the Taliban shot her in the head in northwest Pakistan for criticizing the group’s interpretation of Islam, which limits girls’ access to education. Her profile has risen steadily since then, and she released a memoir in October, I Am Malala, that was co-written with British journalist Christina Lamb.
While Malala has become a hero to many across the world for opposing the Taliban and standing up for girls’ education, conspiracy theories have flourished in Pakistan that her shooting was staged to create a hero for the West to embrace.
Adeeb Javedani, president of the All Pakistan Private Schools Management Association, said his group banned Malala’s book from the libraries of its 40,000 affiliated schools and called on the government to bar it from school curricula.
“Everything about Malala is now becoming clear,” Javedani said. “To me, she is represent- ing the West, not us.”
Kashif Mirza, the chairman of the All Pakistan Private Schools Federation, said his group also has banned Malala’s book in its affiliated schools.
Malala “was a role model for children, but this book has made her controversial,” Mirza said. “Through this book, she became a tool in the hands of the Western powers.”
He said the book did not show enough respect for Islam because it mentioned Prophet Muhammad’s name without using the abbreviation PUH — “peace be upon him” — as is customary in many parts of the Muslim world. He also said it spoke favorably of author Salman Rushdie, who angered many Muslims with his book The Satanic Verses, and Ahmadis, members of a minority sect who have been declared non-Muslims under Pakistani law.
In her reference to Rushdie, Malala said in the book that her father saw The Satanic Verses as “offensive to Islam but believes strongly in the freedom of speech.”
“First, let’s read the book and then why not respond with our own book,” the book quotes her father as saying.
Malala also mentioned in the book that Pakistan’s population of 180 million people includes more than 2 million Ahmadis, “who say they are Muslim though our government says they are not.”
“Sadly those minority communities are often attacked,” the book says, referring also to Pakistan’s 2 million Christians.
The conspiracy theories around Malala reflect the level of influence that rightist Islamists sympathetic to the Taliban have in Pakistan. They also reflect the poor state of education in Pakistan, where fewer than half the country’s children complete a basic, primary education.
Millions of children attend private school throughout the country because of the poor state of the public system.
The Taliban blew up scores of schools and discouraged girls from getting an education when they took over the Swat Valley, where Malala lived, several years ago. The army staged a large ground offensive in Swat in 2009 that pushed many militants out of the valley, but periodic attacks still occur. The mastermind of the attack on Malala, Mullah Fazlullah, recently was appointed the new head of the Pakistani Taliban after the former chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, was killed in a U.S. drone strike.
The Pakistan army on Sunday condemned a prominent Islamic political leader who called Mehsud a martyr.
Syed Munawar Hasan, the head of the Jamaat-e-Islami party, told a Pakistani TV station earlier this month that he thought Mehsud was a martyr. He later implied that Pakistani soldiers killed while fighting Islamic militants are not martyrs because they are allied with the U.S.
In a statement posted on its website, the army condemned Hasan’s comments as “irresponsible and misleading,” demanding he apologize.
The Pakistani Taliban have killed thousands of civilians and security forces in their quest to overthrow the country’s democratic government and impose a harsh version of Islamic law.
Many analysts have also criticized comments like those made by Hasan that glorify the Taliban, saying they confuse the Pakistani public about the country’s true enemies.
The leader of another one of Pakistan’s main Islamic political parties, Maulana Fazlur Rehman, said after the Nov. 1 drone strike that killed Mehsud that he would even call a dog a martyr if it was killed by the U.S. — a particularly strong statement, because dogs are widely disliked across the Muslim world. Rehman is the head of the Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam party.
Analysts also have criticized the response by civilian Pakistani officials to the drone strike that killed Mehsud. The officials condemned the U.S. for killing the Taliban chief and accused Washington of sabotaging peace talks with the militant group, without mentioning the scores of Pakistanis whom Mehsud was responsible for killing.