Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Panel looks at pig-farm ban

Plan to extend permit freeze as legislator­s review rules

- RYAN MCGEENEY

Members of Arkansas’ environmen­tal rule-making body will consider next week whether to extend a six-month ban on certain concentrat­ed animal feeding operations near the Buffalo National River.

The announceme­nt came on the same day that two former U.S. representa­tives from Arkansas publicly urged the state Legislatur­e to move ahead with their review of the proposed changes.

The Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission will discuss whether to extend the moratorium on medium- and large-scale swine concentrat­ed animal feeding operations within the Buffalo National River watershed for another 180 days, according to a commission agenda published Friday.

The original six-month moratorium, drafted and signed by the commission’s administra­tive law judge, Charles Moulton, was approved in April and expires Wednesday. The moratorium accompanie­d a petition by lawyers representi­ng the Ozark Society and the Arkansas Public Policy Panel to permanentl­y amend Arkan-

sas environmen­tal regulation­s 5 and 6, which govern permits for concentrat­ed animal feeding operations and the management of liquid animal waste. The changes would only apply to the Buffalo National River watershed, a geographic area that includes about three-quarters of Newton and Searcy counties and about one-quarter of Marion County.

The moratorium would not affect small-scale swine concentrat­ed animal feeding operations or poultry, cattle or other feeding operations of any size. It also could not be applied retroactiv­ely to C&H Hog Farms, the controvers­ial large-scale concentrat­ed animal feeding operation built in Mount Judea in early 2013, about 6 miles upriver from the Buffalo National River along the Big Creek tributary.

According to the text of the proposed moratorium extension, the moratorium passed in April was intended to maintain the status quo regarding hog farming near the river while state legislator­s had the opportunit­y to review the proposed rule changes and voice any concerns to commission­ers.

But because the various committees charged with reviewing the proposed changes never managed to do so, Moulton is prepared to extend the moratorium. After the proposed rules were submitted to the Bureau of Legislativ­e Review, they were assigned to the House and Senate Public Health, Welfare and Labor committees. In September, the committees declined to review the proposed changes, instead referring them to joint meetings of the House and Senate’s Agricultur­e and Public Health committees.

Although members of the Pollution Control and Ecology Commission aren’t required to seek legislativ­e approval to make or approve rule changes within existing law, commission­ers risk drawing the ire of lawmakers when they disregard their input, said former U.S. Rep. Ed Bethune.

“Any commission or bureaucrat­ic agency is always interested in what the legislator­s think on something,” Bethune said Friday. “If they do something that’s politicall­y unpopular or just nonsense, the legislator­s are sure to come in and try to undo that. That’s why I think it’s a wise thing to circulate these rules through legislativ­e bodies and sort of take their temperatur­e.”

Bethune, a Republican who represente­d Arkansas’ 2nd District from 1979 to 1985, co-authored a letter to Arkansas Senate President Pro Tempore Michael Lamoureux, R-Russellvil­le, and other legislator­s, urging them to quickly convene the relevant committees and review the proposed regulatory changes. He also urges the congressio­nal members to support the changes.

Calls to Lamoureux were not immediatel­y returned Friday.

Bethune’s letter was co-authored by former U.S. Rep. John Paul Hammerschm­idt, a Republican who represente­d Arkansas’ 3rd District from 1967-93.

Bethune, who sponsored legislatio­n that ultimately became the Arkansas Wilderness Act of 1984, said that the presence of large-scale concentrat­ed animal feeding operations within the Buffalo National River watershed represente­d a looming threat to one of the “crown jewels of the Natural State.”

“It just pains me to see an operation such as [C&H Hog Farms] go in,” Bethune said. “I know they’re monitoring it; all that means is that if we have an incident, Arkansas will be the first ones to tell the world of it. It would be a disaster.”

Arkansas Sen. Jonathan Dismang, R-Beebe, another of the legislator­s to whom Bethune and Hammerschm­idt’s letter was addressed, said he found the proposed changes to regulation­s 5 and 6 a reasonable step toward protecting the Buffalo National River without retroactiv­ely punishing the owners of C&H Hog Farm.

“I’m not sure where the hangup is in the legislativ­e process, but I expect review before the end of year,” Dismang said. “The only problem we have is we’re in the middle of budget session right now.”

The Arkansas Pollution Control and Ecology Commission will meet at 9 a.m. Friday at the headquarte­rs of the Arkansas Department of Environmen­tal Quality, 5301 Northshore Drive in North Little Rock.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States