Swiss franc’s jump putting cash squeeze on foreign borrowers
BUCHAREST, Romania — Elvis Constantin Cluci and his wife had planned a second child, their dreams set on a little brother for their 2½-year-old daughter.
But because of a surge in the Swiss franc that caused the Romanian couple’s mortgage payments to rise, not only is another child out of the question, but they also have had to send their daughter to live with grandparents 60 miles away.
Now they see her only once or twice a month. They cannot afford both day care and their mortgage on a small studio apartment in Bucharest. They can barely even scrape together the gas money to drive to see her.
“I can hardly smile anymore,” said Cluci, 37. “My wife is completely destroyed. As the man I have to be strong and bear it.”
On Jan. 15, the Swiss national bank ended a policy meant to limit the franc’s value against the euro — causing the franc to surge. That move by one of Europe’s richest countries is adding to the financial despair of hundreds of thousands of people across some of the poorest regions of the continent because of mortgages taken out years ago in Swiss francs.
Many of the borrowers were in their 20s and 30s when they took out loans in the boom years before the crisis of 2008. They were supposed to be the first generation to benefit fully from
the economic promise that came with the fall of communism and the entry into the European Union. Mortgages in foreign currencies were particularly popular because they came with lower interest rates.
Instead, these borrowers now find themselves stuck in a new kind of servitude, their fates tied to the ups and downs of a currency that many have never held in their hands.
The pain of the borrowers is turning into a key political issue in many countries, primarily Poland and Croatia, where elections are on the horizon. Many of the borrowers feel they were tricked by the banks into financial products that are now called “toxic” — and have been banned in many countries. They want governments to push banks to give them some relief.
It’s a tricky position for leaders: Do you force banks to take a financial hit to help people who willingly entered into risky contracts?
Responses by governments have varied.
The Hungarian government forced banks in November to convert Swiss franc loans to the local currency at the exchange rate of the time. The timing prevented financial disaster for many Hungarian borrowers in January.
The government of Croatia, where there are 60,000 such loans, froze the franckuna exchange rate at pre-Jan. 15 levels for one year to help borrowers.
Other countries, such as Poland and Romania, are still debating what to do but have ruled out a Hungarian-style solution. Polish authorities are urging banks to take voluntary steps to help borrowers.
Wiktor Nozycki, a 31-yearold Pole who has a mortgage on an apartment in Poznan, said a plan proposed by Polish authorities primarily benefits the banks and that he considers the government and bankers to be acting like gangsters.
“No one warned the consumers about any risks,” he said. “Banks here are above the law.”
The anger is huge in Poland, where there are more than 550,000 outstanding loans, and class-action lawsuits against banks are in the works. In Slovenia, an association of affected citizens is also threatening to sue the banks.
Economist Piotr Bujak with Bank PKO BP said many of the accusations against the banks are unfair and that customers were generally informed of the exchange rate risks.
“As long as the servicing of mortgages in Swiss francs was cheaper, customers were happy, while now they want others — banks, taxpayers — to cover the increased costs,” Bujak said.
Many borrowers now owe more on their homes than they are worth and cannot sell without incurring significant loss, also because property prices have fallen since the boom years.
Dorota Smetek, a 30-yearold assistant professor of linguistics in Poznan, feels she was tricked by her bank and is considering joining one of the lawsuits.
In 2008, at 24, she took an 11-year mortgage to buy a small one-bedroom apartment for $68,500. The bank had predicted her payments would be around $685, but right after she signed the deal the financial crisis hit, and she immediately found herself paying $825 per month. Her most recent installment was $960, something she can’t pay without her parents’ help.
“There wasn’t a single installment that was what the bank said it would be,” she said. “I am starting to think someone is taking me for a fool. I feel I was cheated.”
Now she feels stuck. She can’t sell because she would lose too much. She can’t rent because that income would only cover about half of her monthly mortgage payment. She has been forced to make sacrifices, such as canceling plans for a winter vacation.
And like the Romanian couple, she and her husband would also love a second child — but not when money is so tight and they are stuck in an apartment of only 485 square feet.