Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

IRS slow to secure data, senators told

Agency chief rebuts testimony, says details on 104,000 likely stolen elsewhere

- STEPHEN OHLEMACHER

WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Service failed to implement dozens of security upgrades to its computer systems, some of which could have made it more difficult for hackers to use an IRS website to steal tax informatio­n from 104,000 taxpayers, a government investigat­or told Congress on Tuesday.

The agency’s inspector general couldn’t say whether the upgrades would have prevented the breach. But, he added, “I can say it would have been much more difficult had they implemente­d all of the recommenda­tions that we made.”

Each year, the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administra­tion audits IRS security systems and recommends improvemen­ts. As of March, 44 of those upgrades had not been completed, said the inspector general, J. Russell George. Ten of the recommenda­tions were made more than three years ago.

In addition, the Government Accountabi­lity Office issued a report in March that identified more than 50 weaknesses in IRS computer security that had not been resolved. Until those weaknesses are fixed, “financial and taxpayer data will remain unnecessar­ily vulnerable to inappropri­ate and undetected use, modificati­on or disclosure,” the office said.

George testified Tuesday before the Senate Finance Committee. He was joined by IRS Commission­er John Koskinen, who disputed George’s claims that the upgrades would have helped deter the breach.

Koskinen said the informatio­n was stolen by thieves who already had personal informatio­n about the victims, including Social Security numbers, birth dates and addresses. The personal informatio­n was presumably stolen elsewhere, though neither George nor Koskinen could say where.

The thieves used the informatio­n to access an IRS website called “Get Transcript,” where taxpayers can get tax returns and other tax filings from previous years. The IRS’ main computer system, which taxpayers use to file their returns, was not breached, Koskinen said.

“We should do and will continue to implement their recommenda­tions,” Koskinen said. “But those recommenda­tions did not go to this particular Web access.”

The IRS believes the informatio­n was stolen as part of an elaborate scheme to claim fraudulent tax refunds. George confirmed that at least some of the thieves were based in Russia, though he said some were in other countries.

Koskinen said the thieves are part of a sophistica­ted internatio­nal syndicate.

The revelation highlights the global reach of many cybercrimi­nals. It could also complicate efforts to prosecute the offenders.

Koskinen said an increasing number of cyberattac­ks are coming from eastern Europe and Asia. However, he said, foreign government­s are often slow to help U. S. authoritie­s.

“As a general matter we don’t get a lot of cooperatio­n,” Koskinen said.

So far, the thieves have claimed about 13,000 refunds using informatio­n they stole from the website, Koskinen said. The refunds have totaled about $ 39 million.

The IRS is notifying taxpayers who had their informatio­n compromise­d, Koskinen said. Their files will be tagged so no one can use their informatio­n to claim a fraudulent tax refund in the future.

Koskinen said budget cuts have hampered the IRS’ ability to upgrade computer systems. Funding for cybersecur­ity has been cut by 20 percent since 2011, to $ 149 million this year.

Overall, the agency’s funding has been cut by more than $ 1 billion since 2010, to $ 10.9 billion this year.

Congressio­nal Republican­s have targeted the IRS for funding cuts in part to hurt the agency’s ability to implement President Barack Obama’s health law. The IRS also became a target after officials acknowledg­ed in 2013 that agents had singled out conservati­ve political groups for extra scrutiny when they applied for tax- exempt status.

Koskinen said the IRS requested $ 600 million over the past two years for computer upgrades related to the health law, but Congress gave the agency nothing.

“So we had to take that money out of informatio­n technology expenditur­es,” Koskinen said.

However, Koskinen said he didn’t want to blame budget cuts for the breach.

“Not every problem is a budget problem, so I don’t want to wander around town every time we have a challenge saying, ‘ Ah, if we had more money, we’d fix it,’” Koskinen said. “This is a technology issue, not a budget [ issue], but a question of security, a question of keeping up with criminals in terms of authentica­tion.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States