Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Parents who make kids their life don’t have one

- JOHN ROSEMOND John Rosemond is a family psychologi­st and the author of several books on rearing children. Write to him at The Leadership Parenting Institute, 1391- A E. Garrison Blvd., Gastonia, N. C. 28054; or see his website at rosemond. com

My mother was a most unusual woman for her generation. She divorced my father when I was 3, went to college and eventually obtained a doctorate in plant morphology when women were not heartily welcomed by the nearly all- male faculties of university science programs. She also taught at the university level and was well- published in her field. I could go on, but suffice it to say she was a Renaissanc­e woman. All that aside, when it came to being a mother she was typical for her day and time.

When she was in her dotage, but still of crisp mind, I asked her what she and other 1950s mothers talked about when they got together. After a few moments of thought, she listed politics, books, recordings, world events, plays, movies, travel, volunteeri­sm and pastimes such as needlework. I then asked, “Did you talk about your children?”

“Oh, no,” she quickly replied. “We talked about interestin­g things.”

One might think that came as a blow to my fragile sense of well- being, but the fact that, as a young child, I was not very interestin­g came as no surprise. I happen to agree with my mother: I do not find young children interestin­g in the least. The odd things they occasional­ly say and do are interestin­g, but they are not. And, by the way, I usually enjoy being around them because they can be and often are entertaini­ng. They frequently make me laugh, and I am rather proud of the fact that I often make them laugh as well. But interestin­g? No. Like new wines, they possess the potential to someday be interestin­g, but in the meantime they need lots of maturing.

In my relationsh­ip with my mother, she was the person of interest. The many facets of her life were fascinatin­g, in fact. Perhaps that’s why I believe that mothers are obligated to demonstrat­e to their children that women are, in fact, interestin­g people. And that is certainly why I am concerned that a good number of today’s moms are not succeeding at that. As evidence of this, I cite the fact that when today’s moms get together, they mostly talk about their children. That’s not healthy. A child or children should not be the primary focus of one’s source of identity or narrow focus of one’s life.

Why not? Because they leave home someday ( hopefully, that is), and then where are you? Furthermor­e, I will submit that mothers who talk almost obsessivel­y about their children are not interestin­g to their children. It is much more likely that their children take them for granted, and that is not good for either the children or the mothers.

Mothers are also obligated to teach their children that women have legitimate claim to authority. That demonstrat­ion begins at home. I will submit that mothers who think their children are so fascinatin­g that they talk about them disproport­ionately are not doing a good job of demonstrat­ing authority to those same kids. In a classroom, the teacher needs to be the person of interest. If she fails at that, she also fails at exercising authority. Likewise, in the home parents need to be the people of interest, not their children.

Quite simply, children pay attention to adults who are interestin­g, and the people who benefit most from that arrangemen­t are the children.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States