Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

SATURDAY, OCTOBER 31, 2015 State ordered to act quickly on health case

Woman sued after agency said Medicaid file missing

- ANDY DAVIS

A federal judge on Friday ordered the Arkansas Department of Human Services to act “as soon as possible” on a Medicaid applicatio­n that a Brickeys woman filed more than 11 months ago.

U.S. District Judge Kristine Baker rejected an argument from department officials that they can’t act on Anita Walker’s applicatio­n because they never received it after it was submitted through a federal website, healthcare.gov.

Baker said the officials could request the applicatio­n informatio­n from the federal government or get the informatio­n directly from Walker.

The Human Services Department will appeal Baker’s order to the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis, department spokesman Amy Webb said.

“It is not our desire for any applicant to be left waiting for a decision on their eligibilit­y, but in this particular situation, we do not have the informatio­n necessary to make a decision,” Webb said in an email. “We have [provided] her attorney with an easy way to get us that informatio­n.”

Arkansas has had widespread problems receiving informatio­n from applicatio­ns submitted through the federal website, Human Services Department officials have said. At the same time, slow progress in completing the Medicaid program’s new computeriz­ed enrollment system has led to a backlog of applicatio­ns.

As of Aug. 2, the most recent date for which figures are available, as many as 31,400 Arkansans had been waiting longer than 45 days for word on whether their applicatio­ns had been approved.

Walker, 53, said in a law-

suit filed earlier this month that she first applied for coverage under Arkansas’ expanded Medicaid program on Nov. 24, 2014.

In January, she said, she called the Human Services Department and was told it couldn’t find her applicatio­n, so she submitted another applicatio­n.

She said she called three times to check on that applicatio­n, but “did not receive any useful informatio­n.”

With the help of Jonesboro-based Legal Aid of Arkansas, which provides free legal help to low-income Arkansans, she requested an administra­tive hearing in May on why the department had not acted on her applicatio­n within 45 days.

Latisha Meadows, an administra­tive review officer with the Human Services Department, wrote in July that the department didn’t have enough informatio­n to act on Walker’s applicatio­n and that Walker should file an appeal with the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

At a hearing in federal court in Little Rock last week, Human Services Department

officials said Walker could appeal through the federal agency, with a request that the appeal be handled by the state. The federal agency would then forward records on Walker’s applicatio­n to the Human Services Department, the officials said.

Susan Burton, the business process manager for the state’s Medicaid enrollment system, said Walker could also apply directly through a state website, access.arkansas.gov. If she were found eligible, the state would “work with her” to retroactiv­ely cover her medical expenses back to Nov. 24, Burton said.

In her ruling Friday, Baker said Human Services Department officials didn’t cite any written policy indicating that Walker could apply through the state website and receive such retroactiv­e coverage.

Notices that Walker received through healthcare. gov told her she “may be eligible” for Medicaid and should receive informatio­n from the Human Services Department, Baker noted.

The notice told Walker to call the department if she didn’t hear from them and that she could appeal “if you have received a final determinat­ion and you think we made a mistake.”

Baker said in the ruling that she failed to “understand what language in the notices can be read fairly to advise Ms. Walker to appeal the ‘maybe decision.’”

Baker also questioned why the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services would need Walker to file such an appeal before transferri­ng Walker’s records to the state.

“A system exists to transfer these records at the appeals stage, and that system has been implemente­d by the [Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services] and [the Human Services Department],” Baker wrote.

“It is unclear why such a system is not available to conduct a fair hearing on a ‘maybe’ response at this stage of the applicatio­n process.”

Human Services Department officials have said Legal Aid has not complied with the department’s request for the names and dates of birth

of clients whose applicatio­ns have been pending for more than 45 days.

But Baker said the court record “includes very little informatio­n about this offer from [Human Services Department Director John] Selig and ADHS.”

“Mr. Selig and ADHS cite no authority that an aggrieved individual must accept something less than what the law provides,” the judge said.

Granting Walker’s request for a preliminar­y injunction, Baker ordered Selig to reinstate Walker’s administra­tive hearing request, gather the informatio­n needed to determine her eligibilit­y and make a determinat­ion retroactiv­e to Nov. 24, 2014.

“It’s great that the judge has forced DHS to comply with its obligation­s under the law,” said Kevin De Liban, a Legal Aid of Arkansas attorney who represents Walker.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States