Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Agency declares wish to aid power-line plan

Legislator­s ask U.S. to delay decision

- DAVE HUGHES

The U.S. Energy Department on Wednesday released a final environmen­tal impact statement declaring that it prefers to partner with a private power company to build a high-voltage wind transmissi­on line through Arkansas.

The impact statement also says the Energy Department wants to participat­e with Clean Line Energy Partners LLC in the developmen­t of a power-converter station in the state to deliver up to 500 megawatts of power.

The statement posted Wednesday on the Energy Department’s website said the department may issue a record of decision no sooner than 30 days after the U.S. Environmen­tal Protection Agency’s Notice of Availabili­ty of the final environmen­tal impact statement is published in the Federal Register.

A news release from Clean Line on Wednesday said the record of decision will include the Energy Department’s decision on whether and how the federal agency and its Southweste­rn Power Administra­tion would participat­e in the project. It also will include the agency’s

decision regarding preferred locations for power line routes and power stations in Arkansas and Oklahoma.

The release said Clean Line expected the record of decision to be issued by the end of the year.

The entire Arkansas congressio­nal delegation Wednesday sent a letter to Energy Secretary Ernest Moniz, urging him to postpone issuing the record of decision until he has responded to the issues that delegation members raised in a Sept. 14 letter.

In the September letter, the members asked for more informatio­n on, among other things, the authority that Clean Line would get from the partnershi­p with the Energy Department and stated concerns on the partnershi­p’s effects on Arkansas and its communitie­s.

“The department should not have issued the [final environmen­tal impact statement] before responding to our September 14 letter, which specifical­ly urged that ‘in our initial response to this letter, please provide an anticipate­d timeline for a comprehens­ive response and production of requested informatio­n,’” the Wednesday letter said.

In partnering with the Energy Department on the project, Clean Line would gain the power of eminent domain to acquire the necessary rights of way for the transmissi­on line.

The company has said it would use eminent domain as a last resort and would rely on negotiatio­ns with property owners to get the rights of way.

“The release of the final EIS [environmen­tal impact statement] marks the culminatio­n of more than five years of work and the considerat­ion of thousands of stakeholde­r comments,” Clean Line President Michael Skelly said in the release.

The multibilli­on-dollar transmissi­on line project would involve the constructi­on of 700 miles of high-voltage, direct-current power lines from the panhandle of Oklahoma, through Arkansas and into Tennessee, where the energy would be distribute­d to users in the southeast United States. The section in Arkansas would pass through 12 counties.

“Today’s news is a significan­t step toward ramping up clean wind energy in our region,” Arkansas Sierra Club Director Glen Hooks said in a statement. “The Clean Line project will mean 4,000 megawatts of wind energy, including 500 megawatts right here

in Arkansas and will also lead to the retirement of several dirty coal-fired power plants.”

State Rep. Charlotte Vining Douglas, R-Alma, has been a leader in opposition to the project. But she said Wednesday that she has mixed feelings about the issue.

On one hand, she said she saw little chance for opponents to fight Clean Line and the government against the project, comparing it to David taking on Goliath. She said she was encouraged by the passion of the hundreds of people who spoke out against the project at public hearings across the state.

On the other hand, a letter Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., sent to Moniz last week gave her cause to mistrust Clean Line and the government.

Cotton’s letter told Moniz of reports that Clean Line was paying the salaries of the Energy Department employees handling the company’s applicatio­n before the department. Cotton’s letter said a representa­tive from Clean Line estimated the company is paying employees between $10,000 and $1 million a month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States