Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Communicat­ion styles causing conflict with a relative

- CAROLYN HAX Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. Central time each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email tellme@washpost.com

DEAR CAROLYN: I understand that telling someone “you’re overreacti­ng” is a cheap way to dismiss someone’s feelings, but what if they really are? Frequently?

I’ve had many conversati­ons with a family member about what he feels is my insensitiv­e, abrasive communicat­ion style. I can see his point sometimes, but I also notice he reacts the same way to traffic, loud children at the grocery store and political news reports. His reactions seem overpitche­d in general.

When he’s mad at me yet again because I made an offhand general comment ( not aimed at him) about the house being a mess, what do I do here? — Overreacti­ng to Overreacti­ng DEAR READER: So he reacts the same way to traffic, loud children and politics. To call that overreacti­ng, though, is to transform a fact — the similarity of his responses — into a judgment that his reactions are too much. That you’re fine, he’s jumpy. That you’re right, he’s wrong.

That’s not fair. He doesn’t need to calibrate his reactions to please you, any more than you need to adjust your communicat­ion style to please him.

Each of you gets to decide how to communicat­e, and each of you gets to decide how to respond to the other person — anything from not reacting at all to leaving.

On your side of the fence, you do have some choices on how to respond to his (over) reactions: “I’m sorry I come across that way”; “I don’t mean to be insensitiv­e or abrasive.” If you’re close enough, even talk about it: “I don’t mean to upset you. I suspect we just have very different communicat­ion styles. Would it help if we met halfway — I try to watch my tone, and you try giving me the benefit of the doubt?”

By offering that, neither of you has to surrender or apologize for who you are, but both of you get validation.

If even that does nothing to ease the friction, and if this is a family member with whom you share a home — versus Mildly Grating Uncle Twitchy — then you might want to consider calling in a referee. A session or two with a family therapist could help interpret for you so each of you is able to understand the other’s language, even if you don’t ever care to speak it.

DEAR CAROLYN: I became depressed this past year, to the point of needing medication, and withdrew from a lot of social contacts. A friend of 20 years, an upbeat, pull-yourself-upby-your-bootstraps kind of person, always confident, always capable, wasn’t very understand­ing.

I am doing better now, but I find myself reluctant to re-establish contact with her. I have always felt I was not up to her standards, and I don’t know if I want to see her on a regular basis again. Should I contact her?

— Checked out DEAR READER: Nope, not if you don’t miss her friendship. A legitimate part of depression treatment — actually, of being human and not making oneself miserable — is identifyin­g people who suck the life out of you and choosing not to engage them.

If you do miss her, then you have to decide whether there’s enough of a chance you can educate her on the bootstraps fallacy to justify trying.

Even if that’s a “yes,” sustaining your recovery is your priority, it’s OK not to contact her until there’s no question whether you “should.”

 ?? Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS ??
Washington Post Writers Group/NICK GALIFIANAK­IS
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States