Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

$60,212 spent by ballot-issue backers.

Money used on ads, signs for economic-developmen­t measure, group reports

- JOHN MORITZ

A group backing a ballot proposal to ease limitation­s on public financing for large economic developmen­t projects spent $60,212 on advertisem­ents during October, according to a report filed Monday.

The proposal, also known as Issue 3, would amend the Arkansas Constituti­on to remove a cap on the amount of bonds that the state could issue for such projects, while allowing counties and municipali­ties to issue their own bonds. The amendment also clarifies that chambers of commerce can receive funds from local government­s.

The General Assembly passed a resolution in 2015 to place the amendment on the Nov. 8 general election ballot.

Only one ballot committee registered with the Arkansas Ethics Commission to raise money for or against the proposal. Jobs for Arkansas, which is campaignin­g in favor of Issue 3, reported that it raised $37,250 in October.

The group reported receiving 16 donations, half of which came from municipal and regional chambers of commerce. However, the biggest spender was Big River Steel Holdings, which gave $10,000.

That company received the largest-ever investment from general obligation bonds from the state, when the Legislatur­e awarded it $125 million in 2013 to build a steel mill in Osceola.

Ballot committees are due to file their pre-election financial reports today with the Ethics Commission. The reports cover Oct. 1 through Oct. 29.

Shelley Short, the executive secretary for the ballot committee, said the group paid $57,446 to Heathcott Associates in Little Rock in October as part of a multimedia advertisin­g buy. The group also reported spending $2,766 on yard signs.

One other committee filed its report early Monday. Fairness for Arkansans, a ballot committee set up by the Arkansas Bar Associatio­n to oppose a so-called tort reform amendment, reported receiving $597 in court costs as the result of a lawsuit against supporters of the proposal.

Fairness for Arkansans was one of two groups that successful­ly challenged a short descriptio­n of Issue 4 set to appear on the ballot. The Arkansas Supreme Court ruled last month that the language in the amendment was vague, and it ordered that no votes on the issue be counted.

The justices’ decisions on ballot proposals have left only one petition-driven measure standing for this year’s general election — Issue 6, a constituti­onal amendment that would legalize medical marijuana. Three constituti­onal amendments proposed by lawmakers also will be voted upon: the one on economic developmen­t projects, another on allowing the governor to retain his authority when he leaves the state, and a third to lengthen the terms of executive branch county officials.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States