Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Travelers wary of device searches

Rise noted at border stops; agency says perusals relatively few

- GILLIAN FLACCUS Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Kevin Freking and Josef Federman of The Associated Press.

PORTLAND, Ore. — Groups that keep tabs on digital privacy rights are concerned that U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents are searching the phones and other digital devices of internatio­nal travelers at border checkpoint­s in U.S. airports.

The issue gained attention recently after at least three travelers, including a Canadian journalist, spoke out publicly about their experience­s.

The episodes have gained notice during an outcry over President Donald Trump’s travel ban and complaints of mistreatme­nt of foreign travelers, but the government insists there has been no policy change in the new administra­tion.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection said searches increased fivefold in the final fiscal year of Barack Obama’s presidency, but still amounted to less than one-hundredth of 1 percent of all internatio­nal arrivals.

In fiscal 2016, which ended Sept. 30, there were 23,877 electronic-media searches. That comes to .0061 percent of arrivals into the U.S. In fiscal 2015, there were 4,764 electronic-media searches.

A senior customs official briefed reporters on the matter Friday, but the agency insisted the official not be identified.

“We see it as an article that is brought into the U.S., no different than a booklet of materials, no different than a suitcase with items in it,” the official said.

“We’ve uncovered very serious and significan­t informatio­n in these types of searches, everything from national security concerns to child pornograph­y to evidence of crimes to determinat­ions of people’s admissibil­ity status under the immigratio­n laws.”

The American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation both said they have noticed an uptick in complaints about searches of digital devices by border agents.

The increase has become most noticeable in the past month, said Adam Schwartz, a senior staff lawyer at the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

“We are concerned that a bad practice that has existed under past presidents has gotten worse in quantity under the new president,” Schwartz said.

Americans have protection under the Fourth Amendment from unreasonab­le search and seizure.

A police officer, for example, must obtain a warrant from a judge before searching a suspect’s phone.

But the U.S. border is a legal gray zone. Border agents have long had the right to search travelers’ physical luggage without a warrant, and that interpreta­tion has been expanded to include digital devices, ACLU staff attorney Nathan Freed Wessler said.

In 2013, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that if agents want to do a forensic search, they need to have a reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing, he said. But the court stopped short of requiring agents to obtain a search warrant beforehand, he said.

And an agent can flip through a phone in a cursory search for any reason.

The law has not kept up with the “incredible volume of personal data that we have in our pockets now” — and that creates serious constituti­onal questions, said Wessler.

Privacy advocates say travelers who are concerned should leave their phones and laptops at home and buy a cheap phone once they arrive at their destinatio­n.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations also is advising its members to do the same.

Those who can’t leave their devices behind should encrypt them and close out of all social media applicatio­ns so they aren’t accessible without passwords, said Schwartz.

But those steps won’t matter much if a border agent asks a traveler to unlock the phone or provide a password, said Schwartz.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection can’t bar U.S. citizens from entry if they refuse to comply, but agents can make things difficult.

Travelers who don’t unlock their phones could be questioned, detained temporaril­y and have their phones taken by agents for days.

Travelers who are not U.S. citizens can be denied entry.

Hasaim Elsharkawi, a self-employed businessma­n from Anaheim, Calif., said he was stopped by agents in Los Angeles earlier this month as he was boarding a plane to Saudi Arabia to make a pilgrimage to Mecca. They asked him to unlock his phone without telling him why.

Elsharkawi, a Muslim, said he refused because he didn’t want the male agents to see photos of his wife with her head uncovered.

When he asked for a lawyer, the agents detained him, handcuffed him and interrogat­ed him for four hours before he agreed to unlock the device for a female agent, he said.

Elsharkawi, 34, was born in Saudi Arabia to Egyptian parents. He came to the U.S. in 2004 and became a U.S. citizen in 2012.

“I was already nervous before, and after what has happened … I don’t know what to expect next,” he said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States