Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

How Arkansas’ congressio­nal delegation voted

- Here is how Arkansas’ U.S. senators and U.S. representa­tives voted on major roll call votes during the week that ended Friday. — VOTERAMA IN CONGRESS

HOUSE

Health insurance sales

across state lines. Passed 236175, a bill (HR1101) that would allow small businesses to band together to form “associatio­n health plans” qualified to sell policies across state lines free of Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act requiremen­ts. Supporters said the bill would give small firms more scale for competing against large corporatio­ns. But critics said that by pre-empting state laws, the bill would result in skimpy health plans from states with low standards flooding markets in well-regulated states. Bradley Byrne, R-Ala., said the bill would help small businesses “increase their bargaining power [and negotiate] for lower health-insurance rates on behalf of their employees just like their large competitor­s do.” Joe Courtney, D-Conn., said: “The guts of this bill — and it is quite extraordin­ary coming from the Republican Party — is to pre-empt state government­s from having any say over the solvency and the benefit design” of associatio­n health plans. A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate. Rick Crawford (R) French Hill (R) Steve Womack (R) Bruce Westerman (R)

Required coverage of opioid

treatments. Defeated 179-233, a Democratic motion to require that associatio­n health plans establishe­d under HR1101 (above) cover opioid abuse and other forms of drug addiction. The Affordable Care Act requires health policies sold in the U.S. to offer 10 “essential health benefits,” one of which is coverage of drug abuse. The associatio­n health plans that are the focus of this bill have no such requiremen­ts. Carol Shea-Porter, D-N.H., said her state “is on the front-lines of the heroin, fentanyl and prescripti­on opioid crisis. Our communitie­s are struggling, and helping people get treatment is key to turning the tide.” Virginia Foxx, R-N.C., said: “We have seen what happens when the federal government dictates the kind of health insurance individual­s can and cannot buy. Health care costs skyrocket and patients have fewer choices.” A yes vote was to adopt the motion in behalf of opioid coverage. Crawford (R) Hill (R) Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Health insurance antitrust

exemptions. Passed 416-7, a bill (HR372) that would end the health insurance industry’s 72-year exemption from federal antitrust laws under the McCarran-Ferguson Act. Health insurers are now regulated by the state where they are based and subject to that state’s antitrust laws. Under this bill, the Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission would provide another layer of enforcemen­t against monopolist­ic practices such as collusion in setting premium rates, allocating market shares and rigging bids on contracts. Doug Collins, R-Ga., said: “By restoring the applicatio­n of our competitio­n and antitrust laws to the health insurance industry, we strengthen the foundation for a competitiv­e health insurance market.” No member spoke against the bill. A yes vote was to send the bill to the Senate. Crawford (R) Hill (R) Womack (R) Westerman (R)

Disclosure of personal Internet activity. Approved 50-48, nullifying a Federal Communicat­ions Commission rule that Internet service providers such as AT&T, Comcast and Verizon must obtain customer consent before they share sensitive user informatio­n such as browsing and app activity with advertiser­s and other parties. The requiremen­t was published in October but has not yet taken effect. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz., said: “When a regulation diminishes innovation, harms consumer choice and is just all-around confusing, it is a bad regulation.” He added that the FCC is “already obligated to police the privacy practices of broadband providers” under federal and state laws. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said: “Signing up for the Internet shouldn’t mean you sign away your right to privacy. Just as telephone networks must obtain consumer approval before selling customer informatio­n, broadband providers ought to be required to obtain affirmativ­e consent” in advance. A yes vote was to send the nullificat­ion measure (SJRes34) to the House. Boozman (R) Tom Cotton (R)

David Friedman, U.S. ambassador to Israel. Approved 52-46, confirmati­on of David Friedman, 65, a lawyer who has represente­d The Trump Organizati­on and President Donald Trump in bankruptcy litigation, as U.S. ambassador to Israel. Friedman supports Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s expansion of Israeli settlement­s in Palestinia­n territorie­s and advocates moving the U.S. Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. No senator spoke on Friedman’s behalf in floor discussion­s. Brian Schatz, D-Hawaii, said Friedman “is very passionate­ly for settlement­s and … against the two-state solution, which means he is basically against decades of bipartisan U.S. foreign policy” to secure peace between Israelis and Palestinia­ns. A yes vote was to confirm Friedman. Boozman (R) Cotton (R)

Employer retention of injury

records. Approved 50-48, nullifying an Occupation­al Safety and Health Administra­tion rule on the obligation of employers to keep updated records of employee injuries and illnesses. Under the rule, employers could be fined for record-keeping infraction­s for up to five years after the date of the incident. If the rule is nullified, the liability span likely would be reduced to six months from the date of the incident. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said nullificat­ion “will not decrease workplace safety” because “the rule is about paperwork violations and not workers’ health or safety.” Sherrod Brown, D-Ohio, said overturnin­g the rule “will allow employers to falsify their safety records with impunity. Companies can avoid OSHA rules and inspection­s by underrepor­ting harm to their workers.” A yes vote was to send the nullifi measure (HJRes83) to President Trump. Boozman (R) Cotton (R)

Predator control on federal

refuges. Approved 52-47, nullifying a Department of the Interior rule that would prohibit inhumane methods of killing bears, wolves and coyotes on the 16 federal wildlife refuges covering 77 million acres in Alaska. Overriding state laws, the rule outlaws practices such as shooting grizzly bears from aircraft and gassing wolves in their dens. The rule requires predator control to be undertaken only for conservati­on purposes or to provide subsistenc­e to indigenous population­s. Denouncing the rule as a federal overstep, critics said Alaska has responsibl­e practices for managing its wildlife population. Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, said his state “is a patch of many different ownerships of our land — state, federal and native lands. The moose and bear … don’t know these borders. One agency needs to be in charge, and that is the state agency.” Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said: “By overturnin­g this rule, Congress would permit extreme and cruel hunting practices that include killing wolves and pups in their dens and trapping, baiting and using airplanes to scout and shoot bears and cubs.” A yes vote was to send the nullifi measure (HJRes69) to President Trump. Boozman (R) Cotton (R)

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States