Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Security prime in budding pot trade

Price tag to meet state rules steep

- JOHN MORITZ

Cameras with infrared technology, dome lenses that can provide 360-degree views of a room and hard drives that can store weeks of footage were pitched recently to prospectiv­e entreprene­urs in Arkansas’ medical marijuana industry.

The extent of surveillan­ce technology is limited only by what someone is willing to pay, two salesmen said at a meeting of the Arkansas Cannabis Industry Associatio­n last week.

“Are they bulletproo­f, no. Can they be bulletproo­f, yes,” said one salesman about the options for security cameras.

People looking to enter the state’s medical marijuana industry, one of the first in the South, say security is a top concern that they raise with state regulators, who have imposed exacting standards to protect the future cultivatio­n centers and dispensari­es.

Among the requiremen­ts — which a group of lawmakers tentativel­y approved last month — is that facilities’ exterior doors be equipped with fingerprin­t-reading locks.

Facilities also must have surveillan­ce cameras running 24/7, and an alarm system linked to police department­s. The standards even dictate how tough it must be to crack into the vaults and safes where marijuana will be stored.

The cost just for the electronic security systems — safe not included — could be between $20,000 and $30,000 for the average dispensary, said Storm Nolan of Fort Smith, the co-founder of the Cannabis Industry Associatio­n.

Aside from the security system expenses, the state is requiring potential pot

businesses to pay five-figure licensing fees and has set hefty cash-on-hand requiremen­ts.

Nolan, his stepfather and brother are looking to open a dispensary and cultivatio­n center. He called the security requiremen­ts “reasonable” and commended the state for listening to and heeding public feedback.

For example, he said, the state dropped an earlier proposal to require fingerprin­t locks on interior doors, after it was pointed out that workers would often be wearing gloves or have soiled hands.

Mary Robin Casteel, the interim director of state Alcoholic Beverage Control, helped draft the rules. She said a primary goal in setting the regulation­s was to contain the marijuana, which is illegal federally and in all the states

surroundin­g Arkansas.

That’s also a concern on the business side of the medical marijuana industry, Nolan said. He noted that dispensary owners do not want their product getting into the hands of black market competitor­s.

And there are other security concerns. Because federal law prohibits banks from working with marijuana-providing businesses, dispensari­es rely heavily on cash — raising concerns about robbery.

In a series of seminars set up by the Cannabis Industry Associatio­n, a session Wednesday evening in Little Rock featured a team of salesmen discussing the security systems. It was hosted by Nolan, and about 30 people showed up.

“It’s one of everybody’s hot topics,” Nolan said. “The rules that were put forward by the ABC are pretty straightfo­rward. It’s not that ambiguous.”

One of Wednesday night’s salesmen was Joey Howard of Progressiv­e Technologi­es, a Sherwood cabling company. He said Friday that the specificat­ions laid out by the state remind him of security systems installed in banks and prisons, which he called a positive sign.

“It will be a flagship for other states that are trying to pursue this,” he said.

To develop the state’s rules, Casteel said regulators looked to other states such as Oregon, Illinois and Colorado that have active pot industries.

A list of Oregon’s security rules is available on that state’s website.

In Illinois, a medical marijuana state, and Colorado, where recreation­al pot is legal, dispensari­es must have extensive video surveillan­ce and security alarm systems, their rulebooks available online show.

Both states have other rules that are similar to the ones Arkansas plans. For example, Illinois requires a state-approved

security plan, and Colorado specifies that door locks must be “commercial-grade.”

However, neither state requires biometric locks.

That Arkansas requiremen­t seemed excessive to one prospectiv­e dispensary owner at Wednesday’s meeting. The Fort Smith businessma­n asked that his name not be used because he didn’t have permission from his partners to speak with the newspaper.

He said too many requiremen­ts could be a barrier for some people looking to enter the industry.

“At times, people act like we’re handling plutonium,” he said. “At the same time, I’d like to err on the side of caution, and I think that’s what anyone should have expected [in Arkansas].”

He and Nolan also expressed displeasur­e over a rule that any vehicle transporti­ng medical marijuana must be staffed by two employees.

“At times, people act like we’re handling plutonium. At the same time, I’d like to err on the side of caution, and I think that’s what anyone should have expected [in Arkansas].”

— A Fort Smith businessma­n and prospectiv­e dispensary owner who asked not to be named

They said that would add unnecessar­y costs.

Casteel said the Medical Marijuana Commission had taken that into considerat­ion and decided to set the requiremen­t to help keep marijuana from leaving the state.

The Arkansas Legislativ­e Council is expected to give final review to the rules for state medical marijuana operations later this month, Casteel said.

The commission plans to begin accepting applicatio­ns for cultivatio­n facilities and dispensari­es June 30. The commission­ers will begin reviewing the applicatio­ns after the 90-day deadline in September.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States