Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Making the border great again

- CHRISTINE STENGLEIN AND JOHN HUDAK Christine Stenglein is a research assistant at the Brookings Institutio­n. John Hudak is a senior fellow in governance studies at Brookings.

Customs and Border Protection last year awarded a $297-million contract for assistance in recruiting and hiring the 5,000 border patrol agents President Trump believes we need to combat “the recent surge of illegal immigratio­n at the southern border with Mexico.”

Those bold numbers may please the Make America Great Again crowd, but it will be exceedingl­y difficult to find qualified agents, or to deploy them effectivel­y, since the border is actually quieter than ever.

Under the Clinton administra­tion, it took 27 applicants to yield one Border Patrol officer. And the hiring ratio has gotten worse. In spring last year, when Customs and Border Protection requested bids for private contractor­s to help fulfill Trump’s order, it wrote that it now takes 133 applicants to hire one full-time employee.

A private contractor may improve on those figures by designing a new recruitmen­t strategy and implementi­ng it in labor markets that Customs and Border Protection hasn’t previously tapped. The contractor may not repeat the agency’s past mistakes, like spending millions on polygraph tests for applicants who have already admitted to disqualify­ing offenses like human traffickin­g. Still, it’s a tough task. The contractor needs to find men and women who will be willing to work in remote areas, can pass the physical fitness requiremen­ts, and haven’t touched marijuana in at least two years.

But let’s imagine that Customs and Border Protection succeeds in hiring, training and equipping 5,000 new officers and manages to hang on to the roughly 20,000 agents it already has (which hasn’t been easy up to this point). Are they as urgently needed as the executive order would have us believe? The best evidence available tells us the answer is absolutely not.

In 2017, the number of people apprehende­d at the border fell 26 percent compared with the previous year, and the totals haven’t been this low since the Nixon administra­tion. The “recent surge of illegal immigratio­n at the southern border with Mexico,” the president’s basis for his border security push, likely reflects only a temporary rise in apprehensi­ons from 2015 to 2016. If you zoom out, that’s a blip in a long downward trend from more than 111,000 apprehensi­ons in 2004 to fewer than 30,000 last year.

Besides, Customs and Border Protection doesn’t even seem to know where it would be optimal to deploy additional personnel or whether they’re needed at all. According to a special report from the Department of Homeland Security Office of the Inspector General, “Neither CBP nor ICE could provide complete data to support the operationa­l need or deployment strategies for the additional … agents and officers they were directed to hire.”

A suddenly larger law enforcemen­t agency, with numerous new recruits and without a clear deployment strategy, isn’t just a financial liability, but a safety risk.

Another Homeland Security Inspector General report found numerous problems with DHS agencies keeping track of and securing their equipment. Customs and Border Protection, for instance, did not have an accurate firearm inventory, and one agent left his gun in a backpack at a gym, where it was stolen.

Adding an enormous number of employees to an agency that faces administra­tive dysfunctio­n and has no coherent plan to detail new agents will create a scenario in which costs will be high and benefits may be quite low.

There’s negligence and inefficien­cy, and then there’s actual malfeasanc­e. In the spring of 2016, around the time Trump was starting to make inflammato­ry speeches about immigrants, the Homeland Security Advisory Council cautioned that Customs and Border Protection’s disciplina­ry process was “broken.” It urged the agency to hire an adequate number of internal investigat­ors and described serious dysfunctio­n in the handling of complaints and disciplina­ry cases.

For major areas of concern like domestic violence and alcohol abuse, it found that the agency lagged behind standard law enforcemen­t practices. A host of harmful activities, from bribery to alleged sexual assault, have come to light and caused problems for Customs and Border Protection in the past.

The risk is that Trump’s hiring surge at the border will please his base, while accomplish­ing little and increasing the possibilit­y of policy failure.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States