Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Who qualifies for new tax break?

Business owners want answers from IRS on deduction

- ALEX BARINKA

NEW YORK — Congressio­nal Republican­s created a juicy new tax break for business owners when they rewrote the U.S. tax code late last year. Three months later, hundreds of thousands of U.S. employers still don’t know if they qualify.

The Internal Revenue Service has said it will provide guidance detailing exactly who’s allowed to take the so-called pass-through deduction. With billions of dollars at stake, business groups are lobbying for the agency to open the doors to the deduction as widely as possible.

Some high-earning proprietor­s — such as constructi­on contractor­s, massage therapists, executive headhunter­s and restaurate­urs — could be excluded if the IRS writes the rules too narrowly. The agency plans on issuing guidelines by June. But that deadline has been questioned by a former top Treasury official given the vagueness of the legislatio­n and complexity of the task.

The 20 percent deduction is aimed at pass-through businesses, whose income is reported on their owners’ personal tax returns. Congress tried to bar wealthy owners of service businesses from getting the break — leaving out many doctors, lawyers and hedge fund managers unless they can find a loophole.

By trying to exclude those service businesses, though, Congress ended up asking the IRS to settle some rather absurd philosophi­cal and semantic conundrums. What, for example, is an entertaine­r? Are humans the only species who get “health care,” or do animals count too? How do you tell a broker from a salesman, or an interior designer from an interior architect?

“We want to make sure that real businesses that are generating real economic activity get to take advantage of the deduction,” said Chris Smith, executive director of Parity for Main Street Employers, a new group formed to lobby the IRS and Congress on behalf of passthroug­h businesses. “You should be able to organize your business for business reasons, and not have to restructur­e because of quirks in the tax code.”

The challenge ahead for the IRS is monumental. The agency must write coherent rules, and then be ready to make judgments on every business in the U.S. And the IRS can be challenged by taxpayers and second-guessed by courts, a process that could take years.

A spokesman for the IRS didn’t respond to a request for comment.

A lax interpreta­tion of the pass-through rules would please businesses, but also could blow a hole in the U.S. Treasury. The nonpartisa­n Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the pass-through deduction, which expires at the end of 2025, would cost about $415 billion over the coming decade. The tax break could be even more expensive if IRS regulation­s can’t keep gamesmansh­ip to a minimum.

Tax profession­als are pleading with the IRS for details as soon as possible. The American Institute of CPAs asked for “immediate guidance” on the pass-through provision in a Feb. 21 letter to the IRS. “Taxpayers and practition­ers need clarity” to comply with their tax obligation­s and “make informed decisions regarding cash-flow, entity structure, and other tax planning issues,” the AICPA said.

This much is clear: A passthroug­h business owner who earns less than $157,500, or $315,000 for a married couple, gets full access to the deduction no matter what they do.

Above those thresholds, the deduction fades for certain “service” industries specified in the law including health, law, consulting, athletics, financial and brokerage services. (The break is completely eliminated for service business owners earning more than $207,500 if they’re single, or $415,000 if they’re married.)

Each term raises questions. Veterinari­ans, for example, can’t know for sure whether their work qualifies as “health care” in the tax code. Even if it does, vets do lots of things that probably don’t fall in that service category, from boarding pets to selling drugs and dog food.

“Consulting” and “brokerage” are two catch-all terms that could ensnare many unsuspecti­ng businesses. The function of a consultant is to give advice: So how does the IRS legally distinguis­h a management consultant, who advises a CEO on restructur­ing, from a tattoo artist who customers what might look good on their shoulders?

“What does it mean to be a broker? It could be very narrow or it could be big,” said Troy Lewis, a CPA and professor at Brigham Young University who chairs an AICPA task force on the topic. “There are a lot of people who are in the informatio­n business, who get paid to put two people together.”

Just as puzzling to tax advisers is another phrase in the law. Any firms where the “principal asset” is the “reputation or skill of one or more employees or owners” are also excluded by the law as service businesses.

This makes many businesses nervous. Contractor­s, for example, can live and die based on their reputation­s.

For “a lot of the big names in constructi­on, it’s their name that is the company,” said Matt Turkstra of the Associated General Contractor­s of America, which represents more than 27,000 firms in the constructi­on business.

What does the law mean, Lewis asks, for businesses that advertise their skill or reputation? If you brag you’re the “best baker in the tri-city area,” will the IRS use those claims against you? Will restaurant­s owned by celebrity chefs get taxed differentl­y from other restaurant­s?

Tax profession­als are poring over old IRS regulation­s and rulings looking for clues. Lobbyists aren’t consultant­s, according to a 1988 IRS memo. Another obscure regulation tries to distinguis­h brokers, consultant­s and salesmen based on how they get paid.

The final version of the bill took “engineers and architects” off the list of service profession­als. Profession­s like interior decorators and designers could be caught up in disputes over whether they’re more like architects or consultant­s.

“You can see how fine the line is,” said Megan Lisa Jones, a tax attorney at Clark & Trevithick in Los Angeles. “The IRS can decide one thing and the court can decide another.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States