Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Consider political risk

- WASHINGTON POST

There is a certain symmetry in the fact that President Donald Trump would target some of the United States’ closest allies with high tariffs in this, the 70th-anniversar­y year of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

GATT was the precursor to today’s World

Trade Organizati­on and an institutio­nal product of American postwar foreign policy. For seven decades, a bipartisan consensus has held that the United States has more to gain by expanding the circle of partners with which it trades as freely as possible. Trump has rejected that consensus, claiming that it was actually a kind of corrupt bargain among denational­ized elites, American, European and Asian.

There is great political risk in what Trump is doing and in how he is doing it.

Long-range thinking is needed to identify the political stakes. Those have to do with the internatio­nal peace and stability and human progress that may come from U.S. orchestrat­ion on terms of reciprocit­y of the global economy. Trading patterns have not always matched that ideal; China’s accession to the WTO, in particular, has not tamed that country’s mercantili­st policies as American advocates once thought it would. After 70 years, it would be surprising if the WTO and related arrangemen­ts such as the North American Free Trade Agreement did not need an update to include negotiatio­ns in which the United States plays more hardball than it has in the past.

Trump goes beyond hardball to bad faith. The national-security exception to tariff-reducing internatio­nal trade rules is and was meant to be applied narrowly and sparingly, lest the exception swallow the rules. Trump applies it promiscuou­sly: It is simply not true, for example, that aluminum imports from Canada— officially recognized by the Defense Department as part of the U.S. “defense industrial base”— threaten national security.

Perhaps U.S. allies will do some or all of Trump’s bidding; there is still time to head off a trade war. Either way, however, the trust in U.S. leadership that took generation­s to build will have been dangerousl­y eroded.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States