Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Board approves Metroplan redo

Agency’s restructur­e meant to improve communicat­ion

- NOEL OMAN

A proposed restructur­ing of Metroplan, the long-range transporta­tion planning agency for central Arkansas, was approved by the agency’s board Wednesday with little discussion and no dissent.

The restructur­ing, which includes a revamped board, a beefed-up executive committee and a new committee structure, is designed to improve communicat­ions between the board and its committees and allow the board more informatio­n to make decisions.

Tab Townsell, the Metroplan executive director, dismissed criticism that the new system was aimed at eliminatin­g the Regional Planning Advisory Council, a 40-member volunteer group that served as a conduit for public input in developing the long-range transporta­tion plan for the region.

“It’s not going away,” he told the board. “It’s being modified.”

The council also provided a platform for criticism of the $630.7 million project to improve the Interstate 30 corridor through downtown Little Rock and North Little Rock.

The council voted several times against recommenda­tion changes to the long-range transporta­tion plan to accommodat­e the project, which includes replacing the I-30 bridge over the Arkansas River and widening the 6.7-mile corridor to 10 lanes from six.

The council recommenda­tions aren’t binding on the board, composed of the region’s county judges and mayors. The board backed the project.

Barry Haas, a longtime community activist and project critic, was the only person to speak against the restructur­ing proposal, which he called a “grave mistake.”

The council “has done exactly what you as a board should want an advisory group to do and that’s to tell you the truth,” Haas said. “The RPAC more closely represents what the public, the community, the people would want in relation to I-30 than the votes the board took.”

The 40-member council will be replaced with three 25-member committees with different policy responsibi­lities, including economic vitality, transporta­tion systems and livable communitie­s. People on the council will be eligible to serve on the new committees.

“Each of those pieces are going to be much less effective than a unitary advisory body,” Haas said.

But Townsell told the board the council wasn’t meant to be a “deliberati­ve body. The new committee structure will provide “multiple voices to help inform your deliberati­ons.”

Under the restructur­ing, the committees would develop their policy recommenda­tions, which would then go to a beefed-up executive committee of the board, which would in turn make its recommenda­tions to the full board.

The executive committee now consists of the board president, vice president and secretary, and has little responsibi­lity.

Under the proposal, the committee would be expanded to include all county judges; mayors from all cities with population­s of over 50,000; mayors from one medium-size city in each county except Pulaski County, which will have mayors from two medium-size cities on the committee. Also, mayors from two small cities in the region will have seats on the committee.

The restructur­ing also will eliminate another advisory body, the Technical Coordinati­ng Committee, which is composed of city and county planning and public works staff. Its members also would have places on the new committee structure.

The board also would be expanded under the proposal to include representa­tives from the Little Rock Port Authority and Bill and Hillary Clinton National Airport/Adams Field.

They would join the state Transporta­tion Department and Rock Region Metro, the transit agency for Pulaski County, as members of the board and have voting powers when the board considers transporta­tion-related matters.

The full board, which now meets every month, would meet every other month under the proposed reorganiza­tion. The executive board would meet in the months that the full board didn’t meet.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States