Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Research to key on worker equality

Input sought on women’s success

- KAT STROMQUIST

Fresh research about gender in the workplace aims to help Arkansas businesses look more closely at how they’re keeping and promoting women in their ranks.

The “Gender Equity Scorecard,” created by University of Arkansas Clinton School of Public Service graduate student researcher­s with the Women’s Foundation of Arkansas, is an internal assessment geared toward the business community in the state.

Set to be presented as part of a workplace-equity panel at the Clinton School at noon Tuesday, the score card features a battery of questions intended to help businesses consider whether they’re set up for female employees to succeed.

“We found that this hadn’t been done in Arkansas,” said Starre Haas, one of the student researcher­s. “It’s easy to say that you’re all for gender equity. But what the score card does, it strives to change the way that businesses think.”

Workplace barriers for women have made headlines in recent years, ranging from high-profile actresses discoverin­g that they’re paid millions less than male colleagues, to Facebook Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg’s book urging women to “lean in” at the office, to the sexual-harassment scandals associated with the #MeToo movement last fall.

Some analysts think that a lack of policies geared toward women — for example, the fact that many workplaces do not offer maternity or family leave beyond unpaid Family and Medical Leave Act time off — is dragging down women’s participat­ion in the economy.

In Arkansas, 53.1 percent

“What we hope it will do is just generate the conversati­on. This is not meant to be ‘gotcha’ or ‘this is what you’re not doing.’ It’s basically to understand: Are we offering an environmen­t that women say supports their growth?” — Anna Beth Gorman, executive director of the Women’s Foundation of Arkansas

of women are in the workforce. That’s more than 10 percent lower than the percentage of men working and about 5 percentage points lower than the 58.3 percent of women who are in the national workforce, according to a University of Arkansas at Little Rock Arkansas Economic Developmen­t Institute report.

Against that backdrop, the research group of Haas, Dylan Edgell, Mariella Hernandez and Christine McCall used surveys, interviews and focus groups involving hundreds of women statewide, as well as models from other states and countries, to design an Arkansas-specific rubric for employers.

The score card asks company leaders yes-or-no questions in categories including

financial literacy, flexibilit­y, job skills, leadership, mentoring and resources. Questions in the “flexibilit­y” category deal with topics such as whether organizati­ons have on-site day care or allow employees to use sick time to care for dependents; “leadership” questions have prompts about the gender makeup of company brass and anti-harassment policies.

Each “yes” answer receives a point. The responses in each category are then totaled and weighted to create a “gender equity score,” which Anna Beth Gorman said could someday serve as a competitiv­e advantage for companies that want to attract and retain top women employees.

“What we hope it will do is just generate the conversati­on,” said Gorman, who is the executive director of the Women’s Foundation of Arkansas. “This is not meant to be ‘gotcha’ or ‘this is what you’re not doing.’ It’s basically to understand: Are we offering an environmen­t that women say supports their growth?”

A ‘BOYS CLUB’

In crafting the score card, the research group solicited input from women throughout Arkansas who work in industries including retail, government, architectu­re and education.

What those women reported wasn’t a shock, the researcher­s said.

They found that the challenges for Arkansas women are similar to those found in national research on gender and the workplace — pay inequity (in which women earn less than men working in the same field), discrimina­tion, limited opportunit­ies for advancemen­t and few accommodat­ions

for family life.

“In particular, having children held women back in receiving job promotions [or] having to leave the workplace,” Hernandez said. “[After having a child], sometimes they were able to come [back], sometimes not at all, [or] sometimes at a different position and salary than they were in before.”

“[There are] just different barriers that prevented women advancing in the same rate and to the same position as men, particular­ly in the top positions,” she said.

Respondent­s also mentioned a “boys club” atmosphere at some Arkansas workplaces, in which women felt excluded from networking events such as golf outings, while others said they had to be cautious about how they presented themselves at the office.

“We’ve heard from women not being able to mention

anything about their personal lives,” Hernandez said. A male worker could offhandedl­y say he was engaged to be married, but if a woman said that, it could lead to bosses thinking that she could get pregnant and leave her job, Hernandez said.

One thing that did surprise researcher­s was what women said they’d prioritize as a way to remedy the problems.

For example, some women in the state said they valued “flexibilit­y” as much as salary in a job. They mentioned flexible start times, working remotely, and paid family and sick leave.

Such feedback formed the basis for the score card, which tracks as closely as possible the specific needs that women in the state identified, and outlines challenges that the women say many business leaders don’t fully appreciate.

Researcher Edgell said

male-dominated leadership at many Arkansas companies can lead to blind spots regarding women’s challenges.

“When you don’t actively search and try to understand some of these issues, some of these leaders may not understand, and [the issues] may not be a priority to solve,” he said.

“I feel like people are just very unaware that this is an ongoing issue,” Haas said. “There have been huge strides in the developmen­t of gender equity, but there’s still a lot of work to be done.”

WOMEN SITTING OUT

“The inability to balance work and family” is a big factor that causes women to get out of the workforce, said Chandra Childers, senior research scientist at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research. That’s especially true “for women who may be caring not only for children, but for sick or disabled other family members, their own parents, for example,” she said.

Nationally, women’s participat­ion in the labor market peaked in 2000 and has been stagnant or falling since, hindering economic growth, according to reports by The Hamilton Project think tank.

The trend is apparent in

Arkansas, where a 2016 report by the Institute for Women’s Policy Research ranked the state 47th in the nation in terms of women’s labor force participat­ion.

Also, the Natural State came in at 50th of 51 in rankings for women’s median annual earnings and the ratio of women’s to men’s earnings, scoring a “D-” in an overall assessment of employment and earnings.

Although the source of regional disparitie­s in workforce participat­ion is hard to nail down, Childers said not paying women enough to justify the cost of child care is one factor. Another, particular­ly in more rural states, is not offering good public transporta­tion. Those tend to hold women back from working outside the home.

More specific data from the UALR report, created for the Women’s Foundation of Arkansas, finds “dramatic” county-to-county difference­s in the state for women in the workforce.

In 41 of 75 counties, fewer than half of women work outside the home. In Jackson County, that falls to 30.9 percent, meaning a third of women living in that county are in the workforce. (Rates vary by ethnicity. More black, Asian,

Pacific Islander and Hispanic women in Arkansas work outside the home as compared with white women.)

The report also found that women in the state are earning more college degrees than men are, but a woman earns $31,790 to a man’s $40,867.

Although Sarah Beth Estes — co-lead researcher, sociology professor and interim dean of the College of Arts, Letters and Sciences — said more research is needed to analyze specific causes for the UALR findings, helping women participat­e and succeed in the workforce is important, in part because it can reduce child poverty among Arkansas households headed by women.

She said there also is a strong economic-developmen­t argument to be made for helping women succeed in the workforce.

“For the state, when you don’t have an inclusive policy about taking advantage of all of the talent that you have, you are hobbling yourself,” she said.

COMPANIES TAKE NOTE

Gorman, the Women’s Foundation of Arkansas executive director, said she’s already seeing encouragin­g signs at some Arkansas businesses regarding their female workers.

“We do have companies that are really looking at what is diversity and inclusion?” she said. “We are a values-driven state, so everyone can relate to, ‘When my daughter goes to work, we want her to be treated fairly.’”

She’s especially heartened by what’s happening in a few companies in industries not traditiona­lly staffed by women but that offer high-paying jobs, such as in the fields of science, technology, engineerin­g and mathematic­s, or in the trades.

One example, she said, is Baldwin & Shell Constructi­on Co., where Scott Copas, the president and chief executive, says a shift in perspectiv­e has led to seven women in senior leadership roles and women making up 14 percent of the company’s employees, compared with an average of 4 percent in the overall constructi­on industry.

“The change has been significan­t, and quite frankly, it’s just been exciting for us,” he said.

At some of Arkansas’ largest private employers, those with more than 5,000 employees, representa­tives say they are implementi­ng programs with an eye toward retaining women and encouragin­g their advancemen­t.

Deb Sinta, Tyson Foods’

vice president of talent and culture, said Tyson has six business resource groups to represent traditiona­lly underrepre­sented employees, of which its women’s group is the largest. Its members work on career and leadership developmen­t, and community outreach.

“What women need, in terms of leadership developmen­t, is a little bit different than what men need,” she said.

Walmart offers a similar group and sponsors mentoring circles inspired by Sandberg’s book Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead. The retailer also offers paid maternity leave and adoption benefits for all full-time hourly and salaried employees, a spokesman said.

In the health care sphere, the Baptist Health system offers a “weekend option,” which Cathy Dickinson, president of human resources, said allows women to stay home with their children during the week and work weekends at close to full-time pay.

The company also is starting a profession­al women’s organizati­on to help younger women visit and network with veteran employees.

Since she took on the role, “there seem to be more women reaching out to me with different needs and concerns,” she said. “I think when they see we’re hiring more and more females in executive roles, they see that as a real positive.”

Mercy health system’s workforce is about 78.6 percent female, recruitmen­t manager Danielle Ferguson said. While the health care group does not have any recruitmen­t or retention programs specifical­ly geared toward women, some Missouri hospitals in the network have developed summers-off, leadership and mentoring programs aimed at female workers, she said, and there is a possibilit­y that similar programs will be started at its Arkansas facilities.

Gorman hopes the Gender Equity Scorecard will help companies, that may not previously have considered the needs of their female employees, find a starting point for such discussion­s.

Women are “the nucleus of the family,” she said. They pass on their circumstan­ces to their children, and their success at work is essential to the Arkansas economy, she said.

“The economy is an issue that can mobilize a lot of people,” Gorman said. “Generating revenue for our state, generating revenue for our families. This is not a partisan issue. This is something that everyone can get on.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States