Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Panels’ leaders again urge 2nd special counsel

- KAROUN DEMIRJIAN

WASHINGTON — The outgoing Republican committee chairmen in charge of a yearlong examinatio­n of how the FBI and Justice Department handled investigat­ions into Donald Trump’s campaign’s alleged Russia ties and Hillary Clinton’s emails once again called for a second special counsel to look into such matters in a letter to top administra­tion and congressio­nal officials summing up their work.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., sent their letter Friday to acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz, and Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. In it, they encouraged them to pick up where the House panels left off and “continue to identify and eliminate bias” at the federal law enforcemen­t agencies “so the public can trust the institutio­ns to make decisions solely on the facts and the law and totally devoid of political bias or considerat­ion.”

“Our 2016 presidenti­al candidates were not treated equally,” Goodlatte and Gowdy wrote in a statement accompanyi­ng the release of the letter. “The investigat­ors in both investigat­ions were biased against President Trump.”

The House GOP leaned heavily on details in an inspector general report released earlier this year to make their arguments about bias having infected the FBI and Justice Department’s proceeding­s. The inspector general’s report found that while certain individual­s, such as former top FBI counterint­elligence officer Peter Strzok, displayed clear personal bias against Trump, there was no evidence that the conclusion­s of the investigat­ions themselves were biased.

Nonetheles­s, Republican­s and Democrats have openly sparred over the implicatio­ns of the inspector general’s report and their own investigat­ion for months. Democrats have frequently claimed that the GOP used the congressio­nal investigat­ion as a means of discrediti­ng the work that provided the foundation for special counsel Robert Mueller’s ongoing investigat­ion of Russian meddling. Republican leaders denied that accusation in their letter, arguing that “whatever product is produced by the Special Counsel must be trusted by Americans and that requires asking tough but fair questions about investigat­ive techniques both employed and not employed.”

But after dozens of mostly private interviews and months of high-profile partisan clashes, the seven-page letter comes as a quiet ending — with lawmakers offering no discernibl­y new insights or recommenda­tions for how the federal law enforcemen­t agencies erred or might improve their work.

Alongside the call for a second special counsel — which Goodlatte and Gowdy first formally called for back in March — the panel leaders recommende­d that others take a closer look at the process of securing warrants to conduct surveillan­ce on individual­s, and how much detail investigat­ors are required to provide the secret court that approves such warrants about “informant or source issues and the divulging of bias informatio­n.” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., the incoming chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, has already told reporters that he plans to take up this issue.

In the letter, GOP panel leaders criticize the decisions several of the witnesses testified to making during the investigat­ions. In particular­ly, they focus on those of former FBI Director James Comey, pitting his testimony against that of former FBI general counsel James Baker, whose comments, they said, suggested that Comey possibly erred in deciding not to prosecute Clinton over her use of a private email server.

The Republican chairmen also cite Baker’s testimony to reiterate a criticism of Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, who they say should have returned to Capitol Hill for a private interview about his reported comments that he suggested recording Trump and then trying to invoke constituti­onal procedure to remove him from office. Such an interview was scheduled with panel leaders in late October, but abruptly canceled during an outcry from rank-and-file panel Republican­s, who felt they, too, should be allowed to question Rosenstein. Some of those panel members, led by Reps. Mark Meadows, R-N.C., and Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, also sought to have Rosenstein impeached.

Jordan will take over as the top Republican on the Oversight and Government Reform panel in just a few days, at which point the Democrats taking over House leadership — and the chairmansh­ip of the panels — are expected to dramatical­ly alter, if not formally shutter, the probe.

The letter from Gowdy and Goodlatte was not accompanie­d by the release of any transcript­s from interviews that have not yet been made public. A classified version of the panels’ findings is being made available to members.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States