Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

6,400 enrollees face coverage loss over Medicaid work rule

- ANDY DAVIS

More than 6,400 Arkansas Works enrollees as of last week were on track to lose their coverage unless they report on their compliance with the program’s work requiremen­t by the end of this month.

Those enrollees failed for two successive months, January and February, to meet the requiremen­t to spend 80 hours on work or other approved activities, such as volunteeri­ng, and report what they did to the state.

Enrollees who accumulate three months of noncomplia­nce are kicked off the program and barred from re-enrolling for the rest of the year.

“If anything, the numbers just continue the pattern that we’ve been seeing since June of last year, which is that the state has created new hoops for people to get tripped up on and that the state is overwhelmi­ngly successful in forcing people off coverage who need it to maintain work and live a full life,” said Kevin De Liban, a spokesman for Jonesboro-based Legal Aid of Arkansas.

His organizati­on is one of three groups challengin­g the requiremen­t in a lawsuit in federal court in Washington, D.C.

U.S. District Judge James Boasberg heard arguments Thursday in the case and on a suit challengin­g a similar requiremen­t in Kentucky and said he plans to rule on both cases by the end of the month, before more Arkansans lose coverage for noncomplia­nce.

The program covers Arkansans who became eligible

for Medicaid when the state expanded it in 2014 to cover people with incomes of up to 138 percent of the poverty level. That income cutoff is $17,236 for an individual or $35,535 for a family of four.

From Feb. 1 to March 1, enrollment in Arkansas Works grew by more than 2,000 people, to 235,962, according to figures released Friday.

Most enrollees receive the coverage through private plans, with the Medicaid program paying more or all of the premium.

Attorneys challengin­g the approval of the work requiremen­ts by President Donald Trump’s administra­tion contend that the administra­tion failed to consider the effect the requiremen­ts would have on Medicaid’s goal of providing health coverage to low-income people.

The administra­tion has argued that the requiremen­ts do support that goal by saving the states money, thus making their Medicaid programs more fiscally sustainabl­e.

Gov. Asa Hutchinson has also contended that many enrollees who have been kicked off the program may have found coverage from another source, such as a spouse’s plan, or moved out of the state.

He has also pointed to figures from the state Department of Workforce Services on the number of enrollees who have started new jobs since the requiremen­t took effect in June.

According to figures released Friday, that number for enrollees age 19-49 was 9,196 as of Feb. 26, including 1,981 who had been terminated from Arkansas Works as of Jan. 30 for noncomplia­nce with the requiremen­t.

De Liban said those numbers are “totally misleading” because they include enrollees who switched from one job to another and don’t indicate whether the new job was a better one than the old one or whether it offers health coverage.

A spokesman for Hutchinson didn’t return calls seeking comment on Friday.

Arkansas was the first state in the more than 50-year history of the Medicaid program to implement a work requiremen­t for some of its enrollees.

The requiremen­t was phased in last year and in January for enrollees age 30-49 and is being added this year for those age 19-29.

From Sept. 1 through Jan. 1, 18,164 enrollees, or an average of 4,541 a month, lost coverage after accumulati­ng three months of noncomplia­nce.

Those enrollees became eligible to re-enroll Jan. 1. The Human Services Department reported Friday that 1,889 have done so. Eleven others were found to be eligible for Medicaid under a category other than Arkansas Works.

Of the 116,229 Arkansas Works enrollees subject to the requiremen­t last month, 13,373 were found to be out of compliance.

All but 197 of those did not report any informatio­n on their activities or exemption status to the state.

Among those found to be in compliance, only 693 had reported to a state call center or by using a state website that they completed 80 hours of approved activities.

The other 102,163 enrollees were found to be exempt based on informatio­n in state records or that the enrollee reported.

The most common exemption, granted to 52,571 enrollees, was for those whose incomes, based on the state’s minimum wage of $9.25 an hour, indicate they work at least 80 hours a month.

Among other enrollees who qualify for exemptions are those who are exempt from, or are already meeting, the food-stamp program’s work requiremen­t, who are considered medically frail based on their health needs, who have a dependent child in the home, who are attending school full time or who are pregnant.

Of the enrollees who were out of compliance in February, 6,472 also did not comply in January and were still enrolled as of March 7. They will lose coverage April 1 unless they report hours of work or other activities or an exemption for this month.

In addition to Arkansas and Kentucky, five other states have received the Trump administra­tion’s approval to add work requiremen­ts to their Medicaid programs. Eight others have submitted applicatio­ns to add them, according to The Commonweal­th Fund, a New York City-based health policy research organizati­on.

Two states, other than Arkansas, have started implementi­ng the requiremen­ts. Indiana’s started in January, although the state won’t check on enrollees’ compliance for 2019 until the end of the year.

New Hampshire was scheduled to begin notifying its enrollees about its requiremen­t this month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States