Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Conway settles employee pay suit

City Council OKs $1.15M deal for officers, firefighte­rs

- DEBRA HALE-SHELTON

CONWAY — The Conway City Council voted unanimousl­y Monday to approve a proposed $1.15 million settlement between the city and more than 100 current and former police officers and firefighte­rs over a salary dispute involving a tax approved in 2001.

Judge Troy Braswell is expected to consider the proposal during a hearing today in Faulkner County Circuit Court. He could give preliminar­y approval and allow time for a comment period before final approval. An unopposed motion filed by the plaintiffs’ attorneys suggests a final OK could come in September.

“The parties believe that it is in the best interests to end the protracted litigation and arrive at a resolution that benefits city uniformed employees,” the city’s lead counsel, Thomas Kieklak, said in a typed statement.

“The city and the class representa­tives worked hard to reach a final resolution that was financiall­y prudent and appropriat­e for the city and the employees

involved,” Kieklak added. “Through this resolution, no fault is assigned to the City of Conway.”

Attorney Thomas Thrash, who represente­d the officers and firefighte­rs, said he, too, was pleased.

“It was a successful settlement for them,” he said of the plaintiffs.

Thrash concurred that the agreement contains no admission of wrongdoing.

Kieklak told council members that the city would be responsibl­e for $1 million of the proposed settlement and that the Arkansas Municipal League would pay the remaining $150,000.

The plan would benefit 66 current or former police officers and 62 current or former firefighte­rs, Thrash said. The plaintiffs’ attorneys also would get a portion of the money, though that sum has not been determined.

“We will have the [monetary] resources in place” to pay the settlement, Conway City Attorney Chuck Clawson said after the brief City Council meeting.

He said the city would rely on reserve funds and “budget restrictio­ns.”

Conway voters approved a local sales tax increase of one-fourth percentage point in 2001 after, the lawsuit’s plaintiffs contend, the city promised to use some of the tax revenue for employee pay raises. The city has argued that the compensati­on plan always depended on the availabili­ty of funds as well as the tax measure’s outcome.

Police and firefighte­rs got salary increases for a time after the tax took effect but did not get raises in 2010, 2011 and 2012, a period when the city encountere­d severe financial problems and the national recession. Tab Townsell was mayor at that time. Bart Castleberr­y is mayor now.

Thrash said he expects the average payment would be more than $6,000 under the proposed settlement.

“The total amount of lost wages for each individual varies,” he said. “Based on their actual losses … they will receive a pro rata percentage of the available funds for distributi­on.”

Thrash had previously estimated the payout would total an estimated $1.5 million if the lawsuit succeeded, but the number of people estimated to benefit also was higher then.

Some of those who could have participat­ed in a settlement may choose to opt out. Among them is Mark Ledbetter, a council member and former firefighte­r. His name is listed in Monday’s court document as one of the employees who lost wages during the affected period, but Clawson said Ledbetter is not participat­ing in the settlement.

Castleberr­y is a former Conway fire chief, but he is not part of the settlement either.

Filed in 2012 by police officer Richard Shumate Jr. and firefighte­r Damon Reed, the lawsuit originally was on behalf of all city employees, although later it was narrowed to police and firefighte­rs because of class-action requiremen­ts.

In December 2015, Braswell certified the class but dismissed an argument that the city had illegally used money from the sales-tax increase for purposes other than raising the employees’ pay.

In December 2018, the plaintiffs asked Braswell to declare the city liable for what they contended was a breach of contract. The city asked the judge to dismiss the claim, and the case was headed to trial next month.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States