ACES ON BRIDGE
DEAR MR. WOLFF: Thank you for your quote from James Baldwin in a recent column. Even though I don’t play, I like the quotations. Do you have a favorite? — Linda Lou, Lakeland, Fla.
DEAR READER: I try to mix apposite quotations for the deal with lines that stand out either because they entertain me or because the quote sticks with me. My favorite is from Matthew Arnold: “We do not what we ought, / What we ought not, we do, / And lean upon the thought / That chance will bring us through.”
DEAR MR. WOLFF: I recently thought I had a difficult decision as a defender and paused for some time in the play. My opponent called the tournament director, and though nothing came of it, I hope you can explain to me what behavior is permitted at the table in terms of mannerisms or tempo?
— Solvitur Ambulando,
Willoughby, Ohio DEAR READER: No variation in tempo is permitted if the sole purpose is to deceive. You can, of course, deceive the opponents by a false card, but not by the manner in which you play that card. When it comes to your tempo, you may not hesitate without a reason; but as long as you have a real problem to consider, you should feel that you can take as long as you like — within reason.
DEAR MR. WOLFF: My wife and I have enjoyed your column for many years, and you have answered our questions from time to time. Now, we have a silly one. Is there a preferred response by the player when asked to explain his alert of his partner’s conventional call? Does he name the convention first or describe the convention first and then name it if asked? Or, does it matter?
— Saints and Sinners,
Memphis DEAR READER: I think I normally say the convention name first; if the listener knows the convention, he can fill in the blanks as I speak. If the listener doesn’t know it, he will ignore the name and focus on the explanation. But either is acceptable, I believe.
DEAR MR. WOLFF: When your partner opens one diamond and the next hand overcalls three clubs, what should you do with ; J-3, k K-Q-10-6-4, l Q-7-6-5, ' 103? Is it best to pass, raise diamonds (and if so, how high?) or introduce the hearts? — Chuck and Duck, Dallas DEAR READER: I would bid three diamonds, feeling that this hand is well short of a three-heart call. I’d need a black king more than I have, and even then, game can hardly be underwritten. Can we find a way to four hearts if that is the best spot? I doubt it, unless my partner has four hearts — and maybe not even then.
DEAR MR. WOLFF: When discarding at a trump suit, what are the implications of starting with the discard of a neutral suit (one you cannot want to encourage in)? — Sage and Onions,
Kenosha, Wis. DEAR READER: Pitching a neutral suit first always dilutes the message that follows. If you felt strongly about one suit or another, you’d begin by sending that message, be it encouraging or discouraging. If you want to encourage, discouraging the other potential candidate allows you to retain all your winners in the key suit. And you can give suit preference by pitching high or low from your long suit when your holding is already defined.