Pro-life’s big moment
Since 1973—when Roe v. Wade ushered in what would eventually lead to abortion on demand, including partial-birth abortion and even the failure to protect babies born alive after failed procedures—the pro-life movement has achieved few legislative victories.
That may be about to change. While New York and several other states have passed statutes effectively allowing infanticide, more conservative states are passing “heartbeat” bills and other restrictions. Information is becoming more helpful in changing the opinions of people not rigidly pro-choice to one more favorable to defending unborn life, at least at late stages of fetal development.
Films like Unplanned, the story of former Planned Parenthood official Abby Johnson and her transformation after witnessing an abortion, are also advancing the pro-life cause.
New court cases have been building toward a moment when more conservative judges, including those now on the Supreme Court, might look favorably on modifying, though probably not overturning, Roe v. Wade. While that is not a given (note the opinions upholding Roe by justices named by Republican presidents), momentum appears to be building in a pro-life direction.
The Pew Research Center has found that while abortion remains a divisive issue, more than half of U.S. adults take a non-absolutist position, saying that in most—but not all—cases, abortion should be legal (34 percent) or illegal (22 percent). Fewer take the position that in all cases abortion should be either legal (25 percent) or illegal (15 percent).
This is why the courts are likely to take an incremental approach rather than an outright overturning of Roe. Incrementalism has brought us to the point where Gov. Ralph Northam of Virginia recently sought to defend a bill (defeated) that would have failed to protect a baby who survives an abortion and leave the decision to the woman and her “doctor” as to whether the child should be allowed to die. Incremental steps could also move in the opposite direction.
Unrestricted abortion has been aided by an increasingly secularized society that appears to
view human life as merely the highest form of evolution, but of no greater moral significance than animals that seem to be afforded more protection in law than an unborn child.
As pregnancy help centers have expanded, as scientific knowledge (including the use of sonograms) have helped change the minds of some abortion-minded women when they see pictures of their baby, as more people become aware that since 1973, the number of aborted babies has reached 60 million and the U.S. birth rate has declined to its lowest level in three decades, there is increasing optimism that the times may be changing in favor of some protection for the unborn.
Still, abortion is a reflection of something far deeper. An increasingly secular society in which its fastest growing demographic ascribes to no religious belief is now of a mindset to tolerate virtually everything.
In the Old Testament book of Judges, one line is repeated that characterizes modern America: “In those days Israel [insert America] had no king; everyone did as he saw fit.”
No one can predict how the courts—especially the Supreme Court—will handle cases formulated to get their attention, but history proves the wisdom of Abraham Lincoln’s observation: “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.” That should include the freedom to be born.
The secular progressives will fight back with everything they have, including their misuse of language to hide what goes on behind closed doors at an abortion facility, but the wind has shifted behind the backs of pro-lifers, and this could be their most favorable moment in 46 years.