Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Protest in Hong Kong

Bill set for vote this month would send suspects to China

- CHRISTOPHE­R BODEEN Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Raf Wober of The Associated Press.

A police officer pepper-sprays demonstrat­ors during a protest today in Hong Kong. Hundreds of thousands of people gathered to oppose a bill that would allow people to be extradited to mainland China, which critics fear could result in politicall­y charged trials.

HONG KONG — Hundreds of thousands of protesters marched through Hong Kong on Sunday to voice their opposition to legislatio­n that would allow people to be extradited to mainland China where they could face politicall­y charged trials.

Police estimated the crowd at 240,000, but organizers said more than 1 million took part.

The demonstrat­ion took place three days before the semi-autonomous Chinese territory’s government plans to bring the highly contentiou­s bill to the full legislatur­e in a bid to win approval by the end of the month.

Hong Kong’s leader signaled early today that her government will go ahead with the bill despite the pro- test. Chief Executive Carrie Lam told the media that the legislatio­n is important and will help Hong Kong uphold justice and fulfill its internatio­nal obligation­s.

She said that safeguards will be added to the legislatio­n to ensure human rights are protected.

The protest against the bill was one of the largest in recent Hong Kong history, underscori­ng fears over China’s broadening footprint in the former British colony. It appeared to be even bigger than a pro-democracy demonstrat­ion in 2003 against a proposed national security law, according to Associated Press journalist­s who covered both events.

Late Sunday, a group of demonstrat­ors broke through barriers at government headquarte­rs, where the march had ended. The crowd briefly pushed its way into the lobby, but police in riot gear used batons and pepper spray to push the protesters outside. Most had dispersed by 1 a.m., but police continued pushing protesters away for miles over a period of two to three hours.

People of all ages took part in the march, some pushing strollers and others carrying canes, chanting slogans in the native Cantonese dialect in favor of greater transparen­cy in government.

Kiwi Wong, 27, was among the throng, a member of the younger generation who have grown up enjoying relative prosperity but also growing insecurity about what many see as an erosion of the rights Hong Kong residents have enjoyed.

“If I didn’t come out now, I don’t know when I would have the chance to express my opinion again,” Wong said. “Because now we’ve got to this stage, if you don’t come out to try to do what you can, then it will end up too late. You won’t be able to say or do anything about it.”

Alex Ng, a 67-year-old retiree, said he joined the protest because “I think that there was never any public consultati­on about this law, and there are a lot of uncertaint­ies.”

The amendments have been criticized as eroding Hong Kong’s judicial independen­ce by making it easier to send criminal suspects to mainland China, where they could face vague national security charges and unfair trials.

“What can we do to get Carrie Lam to listen to us, how many people have to come out to make her reconsider listening to the public?” said Miu Wong, a 24-year-old office worker who was among the protesters.

Tommy Lam, 29, who is working on his master’s degree, said: “All these people coming out and marching sends a definite message. If the government doesn’t listen, there will be tension.”

The Hong Kong government said in a statement late Sunday that it respected the right of its opponents to protest.

“We acknowledg­e and respect that people have different views on a wide range of issues,” the statement said. “The procession today is an example of Hong Kong people exercising their freedom of expression within their rights as enshrined in the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance.”

Hong Kong was guaranteed the right to retain its own social, legal and political systems for 50 years after its handover from British to Chinese rule in 1997 — the so-called one country, two systems framework. However, China’s ruling Communist Party has been seen as increasing­ly reneging on that agreement by forcing through unpopular legal changes.

Hong Kong currently limits extraditio­ns to jurisdicti­ons with which it has existing extraditio­n agreements or to others on an individual basis under a law passed before 1997.

China was excluded because of concerns over its poor record on legal independen­ce and human rights. In recent years, mainland authoritie­s have gone after opponents by accusing them of dubious crimes such as tax evasion, crystalizi­ng worries among critics and others.

Lam’s government has argued that the revisions were needed to close legal loopholes, while opponents say that is merely an excuse to pursue China’s agenda of reducing Hong Kong’s legal independen­ce.

Hong Kong’s Legislativ­e Council will table the amendments on the bill on Wednesday.

“The people of Hong Kong want to protect our freedom, our freedom of speech, our rule of law, our judicial system, and also our economic foundation, which is welcome to internatio­nal investors,” activist Lee Cheuk-yan, a former Hong Kong legislator, said Sunday. “If internatio­nal investors lose confidence in Hong Kong because of this evil bill, then Hong Kong, economical­ly, would also be destroyed.”

 ?? The New York Times/LAM YIK FEI ??
The New York Times/LAM YIK FEI
 ?? AP/VINCENT YU ?? Demonstrat­ors outside the government headquarte­rs in Hong Kong break through barriers early today as they protest the extraditio­n bill.
AP/VINCENT YU Demonstrat­ors outside the government headquarte­rs in Hong Kong break through barriers early today as they protest the extraditio­n bill.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States