Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Migrant abortion ban is blocked

Court upholds ruling against rules for teens in U.S. custody

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Jessica Gresko of The Associated Press; and by Nikita Stewart of The New York Times.

WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court in Washington ruled Friday against a policy under President Donald Trump’s administra­tion it described as a “blanket ban” preventing migrant teens in government custody from getting abortions, and it kept in place an order blocking the policy.

The policy, which dates to 2017, prohibited shelters from facilitati­ng abortions for children held in government shelters after entering the country illegally. The policy has not been in force since March 2018, when a judge blocked it, writing that the government couldn’t implement a policy that strips minors of the right to make their own reproducti­ve choices. On Friday, a threejudge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld that judge’s ruling.

“We are unanimous in rejecting the government’s position that its denial of abortion access can be squared with Supreme Court precedent,” the opinion says. The Supreme Court first announced the right to an abortion in its 1973 Roe v. Wade case, and subsequent rulings have upheld it.

The opinion for the panel of judges — Sri Srinivasan, Robert Wilkins and Laurence Silberman — was unsigned. Beyond that agreement, however, Silberman wrote a dissent to explain why he wouldn’t have allowed the case to go forward as a class action. And he argued in support of giving officials a limited window to transfer a minor out of government custody to the care of a sponsor, where the child could then obtain an abortion without the government’s assistance. Srinivasan and Wilkins were appointed by President Barack Obama, and Silberman by President Ronald Reagan.

The Trump administra­tion could now ask the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to hear the case. It could also appeal to the Supreme Court. But Justice Brett Kavanaugh likely wouldn’t take part in the case. That’s because he ruled on the case at an earlier stage as a judge on the D.C. Circuit, where he made the argument Silberman repeated about transferri­ng a minor to a sponsor’s care. That would leave eight justices, four liberals and four conservati­ves, to rule on the case.

The case against the administra­tion’s policy was brought by the American Civil Liberties Union, which represente­d several pregnant minors who were seeking abortions. In those instances, teens who sought abortions were ultimately able to obtain them. And since the judge’s order in 2018 blocking the policy, other minors in government custody who have sought abortions have been able to get them.

“The Trump administra­tion’s cruel policy of blocking young immigrant women in federal custody from accessing abortion was a blatant abuse of power,” said Brigitte Amiri, deputy director of the ACLU Reproducti­ve Freedom Project, in a statement after the ruling. “We are relieved that today’s ruling continues to prevent the policy from taking effect while the case proceeds, and allows the case to proceed as a class action as we continue this fight.”

Separately, New York City will spend $250,000 to help poor women who travel from other states to obtain abortions there, inserting itself into the increasing­ly contentiou­s debate over access to the procedure.

The money will go to the New York Abortion Access Fund, according to City Councilman Carlina Rivera, D-Manhattan, and Jennifer Fermino, a spokesman for the council speaker, Corey Johnson. Abortion rights activists believe that this is the first time that a city will allocate money specifical­ly for abortions.

City officials said the contributi­on, which would be included in the budget being negotiated between the council and the mayor’s office, would allow about 500 women to terminate their pregnancie­s.

The city provides funding to the nonprofit Planned Parenthood, but that organizati­on’s affiliates charge patients on a sliding scale and offer a range of services. The city’s public hospital system also performs abortions, but women face a bureaucrac­y of requests for proof of income, private insurance and Medicaid.

The abortion access fund provides payment to clinics on behalf of women who might not be able to pay for abortions but are not covered by insurance or Medicaid. Roughly a third of the fund goes to women who come to New York for abortions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States