Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

EU says Russian groups meddled in elections

- ADAM SATARIANO

LONDON — European authoritie­s blamed Russian groups Friday for disinforma­tion campaigns designed to depress turnout and sway public opinion in last month’s European Union elections, an official accounting that underscore­d how Russian interferen­ce has not abated and that Facebook and other tech platforms remain vulnerable to meddling.

The preliminar­y review by the European Commission and the bloc’s foreign policy and security arm found that Russian-linked groups and other nonstate actors had worked to undermine credibilit­y in the European Union through Facebook, Twitter and YouTube. Officials said new regulation­s might be needed to force Internet platforms to do more to stop the spread of deliberate­ly false informatio­n.

“The evidence collected revealed a continued and sustained disinforma­tion activity by Russian sources aiming to suppress turnout and influence voter preference­s,” the report said.

The report was the first official substantia­tion by the European Commission of the role that Russians and other groups played in disinforma­tion in the May elections, which many investigat­ors, academics and advocacy groups had warned about. It was a reminder of how active Russians and others continue to be in spreading divisive content online to inflame and stoke electorate­s all over the world, a strategy that the Kremlin had pioneered in the 2016 U.S. presidenti­al election.

Since then, Facebook, Twitter and others have vowed to clamp down on foreign interferen­ce and have worked on new technology and other methods to stop outside meddling during elections. But the report Friday highlighte­d how much work the platforms still needed to do to stay a step ahead of disinforma­tion networks. The report also has implicatio­ns for American officials ahead of the 2020 presidenti­al election, with an increasing number of smaller, harder-to-detect domestic groups adopting Russia-like strategies to influence voters.

“The genie’s out of the bottle,” said Ben Nimmo, a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council’s Digital Forensic Research Lab who has been tracking disinforma­tion efforts in Europe. “What we’ve seen over the past few years is an increasing number of actors, both state and nonstate, using similar methods online to interfere in democratic processes.”

European officials did not draw a direct link in the report between the disinforma­tion campaigns and the Kremlin or provide details about what groups in Russia or elsewhere were behind the efforts. The report also stopped short of assessing whether the tactics had an effect on how people voted, with turnout in the elections having hit record levels. The report largely cited the findings of outside researcher­s who had been tracking the European elections.

“There was no Big Bang moment. There was no new Facebook-Cambridge Analytica case that we know of,” Vera Jourova, a European commission­er, said during a news conference in Brussels. Yet “the European elections were not free of disinforma­tion.” She added that the continued online meddling was “something we cannot accept.”

Facebook said it had taken steps to protect the integrity of the European elections, including entering into partnershi­ps with local fact-checking organizati­ons, adopting new rules to show who was buying political ads on its platform and dedicating teams of employees to monitor election interferen­ce.

“The fight against false news will never be over,” the Silicon Valley company said in a statement in response to the report. “That is why we are making significan­t investment­s to remove fake accounts and clickbait and to promote high-quality journalism and news literacy.”

Twitter and Google did not respond to requests for comment.

In the run-up to the voting, researcher­s highlighte­d efforts by Russia-linked groups and those in favor of far-right policies to use Facebook and Twitter to spread false informatio­n and exaggerate political divisions.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States