Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Dutch court upholds liability in ’95 massacre

- MIKE CORDER

THE HAGUE, Netherland­s — The Dutch Supreme Court on Friday upheld a lower court’s ruling that the Netherland­s is partially liable in the deaths of some 350 Muslim men who were killed by Bosnian Serb forces during the 1995 Srebrenica massacre.

The Netherland­s’ highest court ruled that Dutch United Nations peacekeepe­rs evacuated the men from their military base near Srebrenica on July 13, 1995, despite knowing that they “were in serious jeopardy of being abused and murdered” by Bosnian Serb forces.

Presiding Judge Kees Streefkerk said “the state did act wrongfully” and told relatives of the dead that they can now claim compensati­on from the Dutch government.

“They are responsibl­e and they will always have a stain,” Munira Subasic, one of the relatives who filed the case, said of the Dutch. “We know what happened; we don’t need this court to tell us.”

The ruling upholding a 2017 appeals court judgment was the latest in a long-running legal battle by a group of relatives known as the Mothers of Srebrenica to hold the Dutch government accountabl­e for the deaths of their family members in Europe’s worst massacre since World War II.

Dutch Defense Minister Ank Bijleveld-Schouten said the government accepted the ruling.

“We want to express again our sympathy to the relatives of the victims,” she said in a statement. “The Srebrenica genocide must never be forgotten.”

The 350 men were among 5,000 Muslim residents of the Srebrenica area who took shelter in the Dutch peacekeepe­rs’ base when the region was overrun by Bosnian Serb forces commanded by Gen. Ratko Mladic, who was convicted of genocide by a U.N. war-crimes tribunal in 2017 for mastermind­ing the massacre that left some 8,000 Muslim men and boys dead. Mladic has appealed.

The Supreme Court said that relatives of the slain men are eligible to claim 10% of their financial damages because the court estimated that the men would have had a 10% chance of survival if the Dutch troops had allowed them to remain inside their compound. The estimate was lower than the lower court’s previous ruling of 30%, meaning that the potential compensati­on is lower.

“The Dutch government is responsibl­e for genocide,” said relative Kada Hotic. “One percent or 10%, it does not matter — they are responsibl­e.”

She added: “We don’t care about money, we wanted justice.”

Dutch judgments in the case have been hailed as internatio­nally significan­t in establishi­ng that government­s can be held liable if the peacekeepe­rs they send on U.N. missions fail to protect civilians during armed conflicts.

The case revolves around the role played by the outnumbere­d and outgunned Dutch U.N. peacekeepe­rs stationed in the Srebrenica enclave in eastern Bosnia as Mladic’s Bosnian Serb forces overran the area.

The 5,000 Muslims who took refuge in the Dutch battalion’s base near Srebrenica were expelled by the peacekeepe­rs as part of a mass evacuation.

The Dutch forces improvised a funnel of vehicles and troops through which the Muslims left the base. As they did, Mladic’s forces picked out the men, took them away and later killed them.

In its 2017 judgment, the Hague Court of Appeal ruled that the Dutch forces’ actions deprived ome 350 men of any chance of survival.

After overrunnin­g Srebrenica, Bosnian Serb forces sorted thousands of Muslim residents by gender, then trucked the males away and began killing them. The bodies were plowed into hastily dug mass graves, which were later bulldozed and scattered among other burial sites in an attempt to hide evidence of the massacre.

 ?? AP/MICHAEL CORDER ?? Munira Subasic (left) and Nermina Lakota of the Mothers of Srebrenica organizati­on sit Friday outside the Dutch Supreme Court in The Hague. The Dutch “are responsibl­e and they will always have a stain,” Subasic said after Friday’s ruling.
AP/MICHAEL CORDER Munira Subasic (left) and Nermina Lakota of the Mothers of Srebrenica organizati­on sit Friday outside the Dutch Supreme Court in The Hague. The Dutch “are responsibl­e and they will always have a stain,” Subasic said after Friday’s ruling.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States