Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

After hype about raids, 35 migrants in custody

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS

More than 2,000 migrants who were in the United States illegally were targeted in widely publicized raids that unfolded across the country last week. But figures the government provided to The New York Times show that just 35 people were detained in the operation.

President Donald Trump had touted the raids — called Operation Border Resolve — as a show of

force during an influx of Central American parents and children across the southern border. After postponing the raids in June, Trump said ahead of time that they would take place last week.

Two current Department of Homeland Security officials and one former department official also confirmed to the Times that an enforcemen­t operation would take place around mid-July.

Matthew Albence, acting director of the Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agency, said Trump’s comments didn’t hurt the effort because it had already been the subject of media reports for weeks.

Part of the reason other, similar operations were more successful is because they were “done without a lot of fanfare and media attention,” Albence said. “That certainly, from an operationa­l perspectiv­e, is beneficial.”

Another factor was weather. Operations were suspended in New Orleans because of the hurricane there.

But the publicity may have prompted many of those who had been targeted — 2,105 people in more than a dozen cities who had received final deportatio­n orders but had not reported to Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t officers — to temporaril­y leave their homes, or to move altogether to evade arrest.

Advance notice of the large-scale operation also gave immigrant advocates time to counsel families about their rights, which include not opening the door or answering questions. On social media, community groups provided detailed informatio­n about sightings of Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agents.

In Chicago, even city officials got involved.

Two city aldermen started “bike brigades,” patrolling migrant-heavy neighborho­ods to look for immigratio­n agents and warn others. Another, Alderman Andre Vasquez, sought volunteers on Facebook to serve as “ICE-breakers.” Over the weekend, it was standing-room only at his ward office as volunteers walked the neighborho­od handing out know-your-rights cards and recruited businesses to be on the lookout.

“We were seeing concern and people starting to panic,” Vasquez said. “We want to live in the kind of environmen­t where we never have to worry about ICE and raids.”

In an interview Monday, Albence acknowledg­ed that the number of apprehensi­ons was low.

“I don’t know of any other population where people are telling them how to avoid arrest as a result of illegal activity,” he said. “It certainly makes it harder for us to effectuate these orders issued.”

“You didn’t hear ICE talking about it before the operation was taking place,” he added.

The arrests of the nearly three dozen migrants — 17 of whom were members of families that crossed the border together and 18 of whom were collateral apprehensi­ons of people in the country without authorizat­ion — were among more than 900 the immigratio­n authoritie­s have made since mid-May, Albence said.

From May 13 through July 11, the Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agency arrested 899 adults who had final deportatio­n orders, in an undertakin­g called Operation Cross Check. The majority had criminal conviction­s, Albence said.

A backlog of nearly 1 million immigratio­n cases means that it can take years for a case to wind its way through the courts. Those who were targeted in last week’s raids had been placed on an accelerate­d docket, with a goal of resolving their cases within a year. The majority had been ordered removed from the country by an immigratio­n judge.

“What we found is that the vast majority did not even show up for their first hearing,” Albence said. “Above and beyond, we sent them letters giving them the opportunit­y to turn themselves in and arrange for an orderly removal process,” including time to organize their affairs and schedule flights on commercial carriers.

MULTIPRONG­ED APPROACH

As part of a multiprong­ed approach to rein in illegal immigratio­n, Albence said the government also had been cracking down on companies suspected of illegal hiring. He said 3,282 businesses across the country were told last week to submit payroll documents for review.

“Part of our goal is to reduce economic opportunit­ies,” Albence said. “We cannot have individual­s who come into the country illegally and then go find work illegally.”

The audits of companies and payroll forms, often called “silent raids,” hit restaurant­s, food processing, high-tech manufactur­ing, agricultur­e and other industries that employ thousands of workers, according to lawyers representi­ng some of the companies. Employers typically lose a substantia­l number of workers as a result of the audits, which can lead to fines and criminal charges against the businesses.

The Trump administra­tion has significan­tly increased company inspection­s, often called I-9 audits for the form that workers are required to fill out affirming that they are authorized to work in the United States. There were 5,981 such audits in fiscal 2018 compared with 1,360 the previous year.

“The Trump administra­tion has been more aggressive than any administra­tion with I-9 investigat­ions,” said Kimberley Robidoux, a business immigratio­n lawyer in San Diego who specialize­s in compliance and who has several clients who are affected.

Still, as it grapples with a record number of migrant families at the southern border, the Trump administra­tion has deported fewer people, on average each year, than President Barack Obama’s administra­tion.

In fiscal 2018, the Trump administra­tion deported 256,086 people, an increase of 13% over the previous year. In contrast, Obama removed 409,849 people in fiscal 2012, an all-time high, and 235,413 in fiscal 2015.

In the first two quarters of fiscal 2019, the Trump administra­tion deported 130,432 people, up from 123,253 during the same period the previous year.

Obama directed immigratio­n authoritie­s to target for arrest and removal convicted criminals, migrants who had crossed the border recently and those who had illegally entered the country more than once. Trump has said that anyone agents encounter who is in violation of immigratio­n law is fair game for detention and removal.

The administra­tion said Monday that it would accelerate the deportatio­n of people who cannot prove they have been in the United States for more than two years, enabling federal agents to arrest and deport people without a hearing before a judge.

The expansion of an expedited-removals program, which is expected to be challenged in court, could result in people being deported without court hearings and could affect their ability to seek asylum in the United States.

Just last week, the administra­tion announced that it would deny protection­s to people who failed to apply for asylum in at least one country they passed through on their way north, in its latest attempt to deter Central Americans from heading to the United States. That policy was challenged in court by a coalition of immigrant advocates one day after it was announced.

The Border Patrol has arrested 363,300 migrant family members from Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala at the southern border in fiscal 2019. Many of them are seeking asylum, having fled violence in their home countries.

Because children cannot be detained for more than 20 days under establishe­d standards, the Border Patrol has been releasing families, who usually surrender to authoritie­s after crossing the border, to await their immigratio­n court dates.

“This highlights the challenges when we are unable to detain individual­s at the border and are forced to release them into the country,” Albence said.

Last week, Trump deemed the operation targeting families that began around July 14 as “very successful.”

The government’s plans changed at the last minute because of news reports that had tipped off migrants about what to expect, according to several current and former Department of Homeland Security officials. Instead of a large sweep, the authoritie­s opted for a limited and more diffuse scale of apprehensi­ons.

The families who were rounded up have been placed in family detention centers, where it is difficult for them to gain access to legal help. But immigratio­n lawyers said they could still take steps to halt their immediate deportatio­n, for example by filing appeals or motions to reopen their cases. Some of the families, they said, might not have been aware they missed court hearings if they did not receive notices of them because they had moved.

Matthew Albence, acting director of the Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agency, said Trump’s comments didn’t hurt the effort because it had already been the subject of media reports for weeks.

 ?? Los Angeles Times/BRIAN VAN DER BRUG ?? A federal Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agent arrives at a neighborho­od in Montebello, Calif., in April 2017. A widely publicized operation last week targeting more than 2,000 migrants netted just 35 people, figures show.
Los Angeles Times/BRIAN VAN DER BRUG A federal Immigratio­n and Customs Enforcemen­t agent arrives at a neighborho­od in Montebello, Calif., in April 2017. A widely publicized operation last week targeting more than 2,000 migrants netted just 35 people, figures show.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States