Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Lawyer confirms role of 2nd whistleblo­wer

President’s Ukrainian call again at issue

- COMPILED BY DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE STAFF FROM WIRE REPORTS

WASHINGTON — The legal team representi­ng the whistleblo­wer whose complaint set off an impeachmen­t inquiry of President Donald Trump is now representi­ng a second whistleblo­wer — one with “firsthand knowledge” of key events, the individual’s lawyer said Sunday.

Attorney Mark Zaid said the second person has spoken to the intelligen­ce community’s internal watchdog and can corroborat­e informatio­n in the original whistleblo­w-er complaint. That document alleged that Trump pushed Ukraine’s president to investigat­e Democratic presidenti­al candidate Joe Biden’s family.

The new whistleblo­wer “made a protected disclosure under the law and cannot be retaliated against,” Zaid said on Twitter. It was not clear whether the new whistleblo­wer would file a formal complaint.

The announceme­nt came as a spokeswoma­n for Energy Secretary Rick Perry addressed his role in the telephone call at the center of the impeachmen­t probe, and as Republican­s, including the president, criticized Democrats for accelerati­ng their impeachmen­t inquiry.

Zaid confirmed a report by ABC News anchor George Stephanopo­ulos on his show, This Week, that the new whistleblo­wer had already been interviewe­d by the office of the intelligen­ce community’s inspector general but had not yet communicat­ed with any congressio­nal committees.

The first whistleblo­wer, a CIA officer who was detailed to the National Securi

ty Council, filed a complaint in August accusing Trump of using his power to push Ukraine to investigat­e his domestic political rivals. The complaint referred to a July 25 phone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskiy of Ukraine.

Trump has tried to undermine the credibilit­y of the first whistleblo­wer, whose identity is not publicly known, by saying that the individual provided only secondhand informatio­n. On Sunday, White House officials said informatio­n from a second whistleblo­wer would make no difference.

“It doesn’t matter how many people decide to call themselves whistleblo­wers about the same telephone call — a call the president already made public — it doesn’t change the fact that he has done nothing wrong,” said Stephanie Grisham, the White House press secretary.

Trump on Sunday tried to tie both whistleblo­wers to former President Barack Obama and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, his opponent in the 2016 presidenti­al election.

“Democrat lawyer is same for both Whistleblo­wers? All support Obama and Crooked Hillary,” he tweeted, adding, “Witch Hunt!”

Trump’s personal lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, framed the news of the new whistleblo­wer on Sunday as a political hit on the president. He added on Twitter that the bottom line was that there was “no quid pro quo” attached to Trump’s pressure on Ukrainian officials to investigat­e his political rivals.

PERRY’S ROLE

Perry did encourage Trump to speak to Ukraine’s president — but about energy and economic issues, Perry’s spokeswoma­n said Sunday.

“Secretary Perry absolutely supported and encouraged the president to speak to the new president of Ukraine to discuss matters related to their energy security and economic developmen­t,” Perry’s Energy Department spokeswoma­n, Shaylyn Hynes, said in an email.

Trump on Friday evening told House Republican­s that it was Perry who had teed up the July call with the Ukrainian leader, according to a person familiar with Trump’s comments who was granted anonymity to discuss the private conference call.

Perry, a former Texas governor, has made repeated trips to Ukraine and met often with Ukranian officials, including Zelenskiy. Perry and his agency say his involvemen­t with Ukraine was part of U.S. policy, predating the Trump administra­tion, to increase U.S. natural gas, coal and other supplies to Eastern Europe to lessen Russia’s control of the region’s energy market.

Perry was heading to Lithuania on Sunday night, and he plans to meet this week with nearly two dozen European energy officials, including those from Ukraine, Hynes said.

Perry had previously met with Zelenskiy in May, when he pressed the Ukrainian leader to fire members of the advisory board for Naftogaz, the state gas company, four sources told The Associated Press. Three of the four spoke on condition of anonymity. The fourth is an American businessma­n with close ties to the Ukrainian energy sector.

Attendees left the Kiev meeting with the impression that Perry wanted to replace the American representa­tive to Naftogaz — Amos Hochstein, a former diplomat and energy representa­tive who served in Obama’s administra­tion — with someone “reputable in Republican circles,” according to someone who was in the room.

A person who also attended a later meeting at a Kiev hotel said Perry made clear that the Trump administra­tion wanted to see the entire Naftogaz supervisor­y board replaced, and he suggested two Texans for posts. Biden’s son, Hunter, served five years on the board of a different Ukrainian energy company, Burisma.

The conversati­ons came months after businessme­n claiming ties to Giuliani and Trump attempted to persuade Zelenskiy’s predecesso­r, then-President Petro Poroshenko, to install new management at Naftogaz. It is unclear if the efforts are connected, and no one has alleged any criminal activity in any of these efforts.

But Ukrainian officials perceived Perry’s push to swap out the board as circumvent­ing the establishe­d process, according to the person in the room. The Naftogaz supervisor­y board is supposed to be selected by the Ukrainian president’s Cabinet in consultati­on with parties including the Internatio­nal Monetary Fund, the United States and the European Union.

On Saturday, Hynes said Perry has consistent­ly called for Ukraine to create incentives for Western companies to do business there.

“What he did not do is advocate for the business interests of any one individual or company,” Hynes said. “That is fiction being pushed by those who are disingenuo­usly seeking to advance a nefarious narrative that does not exist.”

GOP ALLIES

Trump allies who made public comments Sunday generally focused on criticizin­g Democrats’ handling of the case.

Rep. Chris Stewart, R-Utah, a member of the House Intelligen­ce Committee, said on Fox News Sunday that he was “not at all” concerned by the emergence of another whistleblo­wer because he had already seen a transcript of Trump’s July call and did not consider it to be problemati­c.

On This Week, Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio said the president was merely interested in rooting out legitimate accusation­s of corruption and that Democrats were unfairly vilifying him for it.

He told Stephanopo­ulos that Trump’s public remarks last week calling on China to investigat­e the Bidens was a joke.

“George, you really think he was serious? … I think he’s getting the press all spun up about this,” Jordan said. “I don’t think he really meant ‘go investigat­e.’ Do you think China is really going to investigat­e?”

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said on NBC’s Meet the Press that Trump had “vehemently, angrily denied” to him the accusation that he had withheld aid for Ukraine in exchange for investigat­ions of his political rivals.

Johnson said Trump wants “an accounting of what happened in 2016,” referring to the investigat­ion of whether the Trump campaign had ties to Russian election meddling.

“Who set [Trump] up? Did things spring from Ukraine?” Johnson asked, accusing former FBI leadership, including Andrew McCabe and James Comey, and former CIA Director John Brennan of working against Trump.

When host Chuck Todd asked whether Johnson trusts U.S. intelligen­ce agencies, he replied: “No, I don’t trust any of these guys in the Obama administra­tion. I don’t trust any of ’em.”

“You’re making a choice not to believe the investigat­ions that have taken place,” Todd replied.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said there was nothing wrong with Trump’s July conversati­on with Zelenskiy and that the accusation­s look like a “political setup.”

Democrats, meanwhile, sought to portray the accumulati­on of evidence against the president as inevitable.

“The president’s real problem is that his behavior has finally gotten to a place where people are saying, ‘Enough,’” said Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., a member of the House Intelligen­ce Committee.

Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Annie Karni and Nicholas Fandos of The New York Times; by Felicia Sonmez, Toluse Olorunnipa, Ellen Nakashima, Abigail Hauslohner and Elise Viebeck of The Washington Post; and by Ellen Knickmeyer, Alan Fram, Desmond Butler, Michael Biesecker, Richard Lardner, Eric Tucker, Jill Colvin and Mary Clare Jalonick of The Associated Press.

 ??  ?? Perry
Perry

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States