Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Punishment turns excessive if parent is angry or vengeful

- Write to family psychologi­st John Rosemond at The Leadership Parenting Institute, 420 Craven St., New Bern, N.C. 28560 or email questions@rosemond.com. Due to the volume of mail, not every question will be answered.

QYour recent series on punishment was thought-provoking. I agree children should have consequenc­es when they misbehave. Nonetheles­s, would you please clarify when punishment becomes excessive? What is the line between reasonable and too much? When I was young, I was spanked with a belt on numerous occasions. I always felt that they were completely unnecessar­y and over the top. Do you agree?

AAbsolutel­y! Belts, paddles, switches and other nefarious variations on that general theme are dangerous and unequivoca­lly unnecessar­y.

I don’t have a problem with spankings per se. The best research (that is, research done by people who are dispassion­ate on the subject) consistent­ly finds that contrary to the ideologica­l myth, when spankings are occasional, moderate (two to four swats on the child’s rear end), and administer­ed by loving parents who spank with their hands only, they are not associated with psychologi­cal, behavioral or social problems.

Then we have well-intentione­d claims that the Bible instructs parents to spank with a “rod,” but the biblical term “the rod of discipline” is clearly metaphoric­al. It refers not to beatings with sturdy sticks, but to parental authority that is reliable, righteous, just and unequivoca­l. For more on that subject, interested readers are referred to the statement on spanking found on my website at johnrosemo­nd.com.

Before I answer your first question, allow me to address a misunderst­anding. I do not believe that successful discipline is a matter of properly manipulati­ng consequenc­es, and I don’t believe it’s always necessary to respond to misbehavio­r with consequenc­es. Consequenc­es are overrated and often overused. The key to effective discipline is an attitude, a certain presentati­on style, not consequenc­es or punishment. When parents act like their authority is legitimate, that they know what they are doing and why, children do what they are told. When parents explain, threaten, yell, plead, and the like, children take every opportunit­y to misbehave.

My recent series on punishment was not apologetic for a punishment-based approach to discipline. I merely said that punishment is an essential aspect of an effective disciplina­ry approach. Research — again, studies done by dispassion­ate individual­s — confirms that assertion.

It’s important to note that the “size” of a punishment does not determine whether it is excessive or not. That is determined by the parent’s attitude. Punishment is likely to be excessive when the parent is angry and using punishment as a form of “payback.” The parent in question is being impulsive and vengeful as opposed to calmly corrective. Whatever message the parent intends to send is blurred by his or her emotional reaction to the child’s misbehavio­r.

Punishment that is driven by emotion accomplish­es nothing and serves only to elicit emotion from the child. It accomplish­es nothing of value; therefore, by definition, it is excessive.

 ??  ?? JOHN ROSEMOND PARENTING
JOHN ROSEMOND PARENTING

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States