Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Wife overwhelme­d by hand-me-downs from the in-laws

- tellme@washpost.com

DEAR CAROLYN: I am a working mother (full timeplus) with two kids. I have nearby in-laws trying to declutter their house. Lately, they keep sending my husband home with various books, hand-me-down toys, puzzles, etc., for our kids. These items are piling up in the car, as he places them there without my knowledge. My husband continues to take these items despite the fact I have asked him to discontinu­e doing so. He doesn’t want to upset his parents.

A month ago our whole family was visiting the inlaws (at six feet distance) and I politely told my in-laws, “No, thank you” to the latest bag. While there again more recently (again at a distance), the first thing my in-laws did before even saying hello was try to give me some boxes of old Legos. I told them again, “We are also trying to declutter. Thanks for the thought though.”

My husband was so angry at me and accused me of being thoughtles­s, cold and hurtful to his parents. He thinks I should have been gracious, taken it and thrown it out or donated it without my in-laws knowing anything of it.

My in-laws will often ask months later, after a birthday or holidays, “Did the kids play with gifts we got them?” Or they will directly ask our kids, “Are you reading the XYZ book we gave you? Why not? I think you would like it!” They see the kids often — usually weekly.

While my relationsh­ip with my in-laws is not particular­ly warm — or cold — it is respectful. They are extremely helpful and gracious to us and our kids. However, I am mystified as to why I need to accept items our kids don’t want or need.

I am struggling to juggle my career, kids, husband, home organizati­on/cleanlines­s, friends, exercise, etc. Why am I now the one having to do the dirty work of donating their items or throwing them out? How did I become the villain?

— Cluttered DEAR READER: You’ve become the villain because your husband would rather have that job default to you than assume the responsibi­lity himself.

Your direct no-thank-you to your in-laws was exactly the right way to handle his reliance on this default. When he chose not to do the dirty work himself, he left it to you to decide how it would be done. It’s simple emotional math.

What’s left for you to do now is to present your husband with a clearly articulate­d chain of responsibi­lity from now on:

1. If he wants you to be “gracious” and accept the handme-downs, then he needs to assume the added labor that he’s imposing on your family by asking this of you. So, he’s the one who sorts and distribute­s everything your in-laws give you. He fields their questions.

2. If he neglects or refuses this extra labor, and the handme-downs just keep piling up in the car, then you will say no to his parents whenever they offer you things. He gets angry? OK. Maybe next time he’ll do his job and sort through the stuff.

These are basic natural consequenc­es: Your husband’s choice is between doing the hard work upfront or postponing that work until later. Passing it off onto you without your consent is the option you strike from the list. Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email

 ?? (Washington Post Writers Group/Nick Galifianak­is) ??
(Washington Post Writers Group/Nick Galifianak­is)
 ??  ?? OPINION TELL ME ABOUT IT CAROLYN HAX
OPINION TELL ME ABOUT IT CAROLYN HAX

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States