Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

DUMAS COACH’S

- CYNTHIA HOWELL ARKANSAS DEMOCRAT-GAZETTE

case sent for evidentiar­y hearing.

The state Board of Education voted 6-0 Thursday to send the case of a teacher/ coach who is accused of texting a racially charged message for a full evidentiar­y hearing by a subcommitt­ee of the Profession­al Licensure Standards Board.

In directing that a full hearing be held by a state panel, the Education Board rejected an earlier agreement between the licensing board and Bobby Max Pennington that Pennington be placed on probation for two years, pay a $250 fine and participat­e in five training programs.

Pennington, who is white, was at the time of the text message a coach and dean of students at Dumas New Tech High School. He sent a parent a text message in May 2019 saying “I hate” and used a racially derogatory term, members of the Dumas community told the Education Board in August 2019. Pennington followed that text with a second text to the parent saying, “Oh my God, I meant beggars.”

Recommende­d by the Dumas superinten­dent to the local school board for firing, Pennington was instead suspended by his district from work for 100 days, assigned to be an elementary school physical education teacher and, while he remained the district’s head football coach, he did not coach in the first five games of the most recent season. He is no longer dean of students at the high school.

Pennington was also reported to the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education on a possible violation of the state’s code of ethics for educators.

The Education Board on Thursday had the option of accepting the recommenda­tion of probation and other penalties or sending the case back to the Profession­al Licensure Standards Board panel for a hearing on the accusation that Pennington violated the state’s code of ethics for educators. If confirmed, violations can result in penalties ranging from written reprimands to the revocation of a teacher’s state teaching license.

The Profession­al Licensure Standards Board Ethics Subcommitt­ee makes recommenda­tions for enforcemen­t of the code of ethics to the Education Board, which has the final authority to accept, reject or modify the recommenda­tions in its final orders.

Greg Alagood, Pennington’s

attorney, initially asked the Education Board members to recuse themselves from taking any action regarding Pennington because of the board members previously listening to community member complaints about the Dumas coach — at earlier state Education Board meetings and in the Dumas community.

Education Board members declined to recuse, prompting Alagood to ask them to approve the two-year probation agreement proposed by the licensure board and accepted by Pennington.

“What are you going to do if you remand it and it comes back to you with a recommenda­tion from the hearing panel for a more lenient sanction than what is before you now,” Alagood asked. “I submit to you that a two-year probation is commensura­te for this case, and I’m strongly encouragin­g this board to go ahead and approve the PLSB recommenda­tion.”

The attorney said the state agency had sent three investigat­ors to Dumas on the case where they interviewe­d 12 people, surveyed 36 students and compiled a 35-page report with 255 pages of supporting documentat­ion and 72 pages of student surveys.

Education Board member Fitz Hill of Little Rock, who had attended two Dumas community meetings about the issue, said Thursday that he couldn’t support the proposed penalties for Pennington. He said he had concerns about the fact that Pennington continues to have supervisor­y authority over students despite the concerns of parents.

“I’m all about restoratio­n and rehabilita­tion,” Hill said. “But based on the firsthand knowledge I have of this case, we are not doing what we are supposed to do in the guidance and governance of our students.”

Education Board member Charisse Dean, also of Little Rock, echoed Hill’s concerns.

“It’s important to a community that all feel safe and feel as if their voices have been heard,” Dean said. “I think we do need to go through the process,” she said.

Those voting for the referral of the matter to the agency subcommitt­ee for a hearing were Hill, Dean, Susan Chambers, Kathy McFetridge, Sarah Moore and Ouida Newton. Diane Zook as the board chairman does not vote unless there is a tie. Brett Williamson was absent.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States