Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Law anniversar­y has Kashmiris set for protests

Natives worry colonialis­m among India’s motives in region

- SHEIKH SAALIQ AND AIJAZ HUSSAIN Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Munir Ahmed and Roshan Mughal of The Associated Press.

SRINAGAR, India — Authoritie­s imposed a curfew in many parts of Indian-controlled Kashmir on Tuesday, a day ahead of the first anniversar­y of India’s decision to revoke the disputed region’s semi-autonomy.

For almost a century, no outsider was allowed to buy land and property in Indian-controlled Kashmir.

That changed Aug. 5 last year when India’s Hindu nationalis­t government led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi stripped the Himalayan state’s semi-autonomous powers and downgraded it to a federally governed territory. It also annulled the longheld hereditary special rights its natives had over the disputed region’s land ownership and jobs.

Since then, India has brought in a slew of changes through new laws. They are often drafted by bureaucrat­s without any democratic hearings and much to the resentment and anger of the region’s people, many of whom want independen­ce from India or unificatio­n with Pakistan.

A year later, things are changing on the ground.

Under a new law, authoritie­s have begun issuing “domicile certificat­es” to Indians and nonresiden­ts, entitling them to residency rights and government jobs. Many Kashmiris view the move as the beginning of settler colonialis­m aimed at engineerin­g a demographi­c change in India’s only Muslim-majority region.

Amid growing fears, experts are likening the new arrangemen­t to the West Bank or Tibet, with settlers — armed or civilian — living in guarded compounds among disenfranc­hised locals. They say the changes will reduce the region to a colony.

“Given the history of Indian state interventi­on in Kashmir, there are efforts to destroy the local, distinctiv­e cultural identity of Kashmiris and forcibly assimilate Kashmiri Muslims into a Hindu, Indian polity,” said Saiba Varma, an assistant professor of cultural and medical anthropolo­gy at the University of California, San Diego.

Residency rights were introduced in 1927 by Kashmir’s Hindu king, Hari Singh, to stop the influx of outsiders in the former princely state. Historians say the maharaja brought land ownership rights on the insistence of powerful Kashmiri Hindus. They continued under Indian rule after 1947, as part of Kashmir’s special status.

The new law, introduced in May amid the coronaviru­s

lockdown, makes it possible for any Indian national who has lived in the region for at least 15 years or has studied for seven years and taken certain exams to become a permanent resident in Jammu-Kashmir. The Indian government is ensuring the process is fast-tracked and has introduced a fine of $670 to be deducted from the salary of any official in the territory who delays the process.

Those receiving domicile certificat­es include Hindu refugees from Pakistan after the bloody 1947 partition of the subcontine­nt, Gurkha soldiers from Nepal who had served in the Indian army, outside bureaucrat­s working in the region and some marginaliz­ed Hindu communitie­s. Even the natives must apply for residency, otherwise they risk losing government jobs and welfare benefits.

About 400,000 people have been given domicile certificat­es in over a month, Pawan Kotwal, a top Indian official, was quoted as saying on Saturday by The Tribune, a north Indian English-daily. Officials have not not said how many of them are locals and have generally been tight-lipped about the process.

But even some Hindu groups in Jammu have resented the law, expressing fears of job and business losses to outsiders.

Authoritie­s have called the new residency rights an overdue measure to foster greater economic developmen­t by opening up the region for outside investment­s. Girish Chander Murmu, the region’s top administra­tive official, in late June told reporters that the law was aimed at bringing economic prosperity and dismissed any fears of demographi­c change as “propaganda.”

Meanwhile, Shahid Iqbal Choudhary, a civil administra­tor, said the security lockdown was imposed in the region’s main city of Srinagar because of informatio­n about protests planned by anti-India groups to mark today as “Black Day.”

Late Tuesday, authoritie­s lifted a curfew in Srinagar but said restrictio­ns on public movement, transport and commercial activities would continue because of the coronaviru­s pandemic.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States