Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

ACES ON BRIDGE

- BOBBY WOLFF If you would like to contact Bobby Wolff, email him at bobbywolff@mindspring.com

DEAR MR. WOLFF: How do you feel about preempting with length in an unbid major?

— Roguish Ron, Summit, N.J.

DEAR READER: I try to avoid it when I am acting in front of partner, i.e., he has not passed yet. Otherwise, we might miss a game in a major fit. In third seat, I have no such qualms. However, if the major suit is poor or the long suit nearly self-sufficient, I might preempt in any position. In other words, four cards to the jack or lower does not constitute a four-card suit.

DEAR MR. WOLFF: My partner held ; A-10-7-5-4, k 4-2, l 4, ' A-K-8-7-2. I opened one diamond, he bid one spade, and I rebid two clubs. He now bid two hearts, fourth-suit-forcing, followed by four clubs over my threeheart call, which showed a three-suiter. Not knowing the extent of the fit, I bid five clubs, and we missed our slam. What went wrong? — Blame Policy, Pueblo, Colo.

DEAR READER: I’m not sure. Could your partner have jumped to four clubs over two clubs? While some play that all forcing hands go through fourth-suit-forcing, others would use the jump here as forcing. I agree with his decision not to bid on over your signoff; after all, it is just a very good 11-count. Could you have cue-bid without guaranteei­ng real extras here? I think so.

DEAR MR. WOLFF: I have noticed that screens are used in internatio­nal play. What do you think about them? Do you find the separation from your partner creates an artificial atmosphere at the table? — Tray Bake, Boulder, Colo.

DEAR READER: Screens help with ethical issues, and I’m happy not to have to think about my partner’s actions or idiosyncra­sies. With a board placed diagonally across the table, it becomes harder for either side to take advantage of a hesitation, since neither side knows who was slow (in theory). It is not just unauthoriz­ed informatio­n problems that are resolved, but also those of incorrect explanatio­n. It can also be fun to drop the flap when the opponents are arguing!

DEAR MR. WOLFF: Say you hold ; 10-6, k A-K-Q-8-5, l 9-8, ' K-Q-103 at unfavorabl­e vulnerabil­ity. You open one heart, partner responds one no-trump, and your right-hand oponent overcalls two spades. Would you act? — In the Action, Brooklyn, N.Y.

DEAR READER: I would bid three clubs. This usually promises 10 cards in the two suits, but the concentrat­ed values make up for that here. If partner has length in clubs, I would like to compete the part-score. It would be nice to be able to compete with extra shape but no real high-card extras. Methods to do this are discussed at: advinbridg­e.com/this-week-in-bridge/149.

DEAR MR. WOLFF: Do you think it is ethical to let someone off a revoke? My partner took it upon himself to let an opponent pick up a revoke card. — Secretary Bird, Fayettevil­le, N.C.

DEAR READER: It is your choice, really. Uphold the laws by all means (by calling the director), but I would tend not to punish an opponent who failed to follow suit in a casual game — if they immediatel­y realize what they have done. Letting them take it back when I have already played to the next trick would not be proper.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States