Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. vetoes U.N.’s anti-terror move, warns of ‘ISIS 2.0’

Because of the coronaviru­s pandemic, the 15-member Security Council voted by email. The result was 14 countries in favor and only the U.S. opposed.

- EDITH M. LEDERER

UNITED NATIONS — The United States vetoed a U.N. resolution Monday calling for the prosecutio­n, rehabilita­tion and reintegrat­ion of all those engaged in terrorism-related activities, saying it didn’t call for the repatriati­on from Syria and Iraq of foreign fighters for the Islamic State and their families that is “the crucial first step.”

U.S. Ambassador Kelly Craft said the resolution, “supposedly designed to reinforce internatio­nal action on counterter­rorism, was worse than no resolution at all.” She dismissed it as “a cynical and willfully oblivious farce.”

Because of the coronaviru­s pandemic, the 15-member Security Council voted by email. The result was 14 countries in favor and only the U.S. opposed. It was announced by the current council president, Indonesia’s U.N. Ambassador Dian Triansyah Djani, whose country sponsored the resolution.

In her statement explaining the U.S. veto, Craft pointed to her comments at a council meeting on counterter­rorism last week. She stressed then that repatriati­on and accountabi­lity for crimes by fighters for the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, and their family members are essential so they “do not become the nucleus of an ISIS 2.0.”

“It is incomprehe­nsible that other members of this council were satisfied with a resolution that ignores the security implicatio­ns of leaving foreign terrorist fighters to plot their escape from limited detention facilities and abandoning their family members to suffer in camps without recourse, opportunit­ies, or hope,” she said on Monday.

Craft said last week the Trump administra­tion was disappoint­ed that Indonesian efforts to draft “a meaningful resolution … were stymied by council members’ refusal to include repatriati­on.”

That was a reference to Western Europeans, especially, including Britain and France, who have opposed the return of Islamic State fighters and their families, except in the case of orphans and some children. The British government says those who are in custody in Syria and Iraq should face justice there rather than going on trial in the U.K.

Craft said the U.S. brings its citizens home and prosecutes them when appropriat­e. She quoted U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo as saying: “We want every country to take their citizens back. That’s step one. It’s imperative that they do so.”

A U.K. Foreign Office spokespers­on, speaking with customary anonymity, said after the vote: “We regret the resolution was not adopted. We are working closely with internatio­nal partners to reduce the risk posed to us collective­ly by foreign fighters.”

The defeated resolution did support the return of children, but not fighters and their families.

It encouraged all countries to cooperate in addressing the threat from “foreign terrorist fighters” or FTFs, “including by bringing them to justice, preventing the radicaliza­tion to terrorism and recruitmen­t of FTFs and accompanyi­ng family members, particular­ly accompanyi­ng children, including by facilitati­ng the return of the children to their countries of origin, as appropriat­e and on a case by case basis.”

U.N. counterter­rorism chief Vladimir Voronkov said in July that his office had received informatio­n that 700 people died recently in two camps in northeast Syria — al-Hol and Roj — where more than 70,000 mainly women and children connected to Islamic State fighters are detained in “very dire conditions.”

The camps are overseen by Kurdish-led forces who allied with the United States and spearheade­d the fight against Islamic State fighters.

The Internatio­nal Crisis Group reported on April 7 that there are 66,000 women and children in al-Hol and 4,000 in Roj, most of them relatives of Islamic State extremists, “but some former affiliates of the group themselves.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States