Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

High court will hear case with state ties

- GREG STOHR

The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to use an appeal by Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to consider tightening the rules for shareholde­rs seeking to use class-action lawsuits to claim securities fraud.

Goldman Sachs, which is fighting accusation­s that it masked conflicts of interest in mortgage-backed securities it sold, says a federal appeals court made it too easy for investors to band together in a single lawsuit. The court will hear arguments next year and probably rule by June.

“We’re pleased the Supreme Court has decided to hear our appeal,” Maeve DuVally, a spokespers­on for the New Yorkbased bank, said in a statement.

The investors, led by the Arkansas Teacher Retirement System, say they were deceived by Goldman’s repeated public assurances that it was being vigilant about avoiding conflicts of interests. The shareholde­rs say those assurances proved false when the Securities and Exchange Commission sued the company in April 2010 over a portfolio known as Abacus.

The SEC said Goldman Sachs created and sold Abacus without disclosing that the hedge fund Paulson & Co. helped pick the underlying securities and bet against the vehicle. Shares of Goldman dropped 13% that day, and the firm later paid $550 million to settle with the SEC.

The Goldman Sachs appeal centers on the rules the Supreme Court has crafted to determine whether shareholde­rs have enough in common with one another to press a suit as a class action.

In 1988, the high court said judges can presume that investors all relied on any public misreprese­ntations when then bought shares. But that ruling also said defendants can rebut that presumptio­n by showing that the misreprese­ntations had no impact on the share price.

Goldman Sachs says it should be able to meet that requiremen­t by showing that its assurances about conflicts were so “generic” that they couldn’t be responsibl­e for propping up the stock price.

A divided federal appeals court in New York said Goldman couldn’t use that line of argument to prevent the suit from being certified as a class action.

The investors urged the Supreme Court to reject the appeal. Business trade groups are backing the appeal.

The lawsuit against Goldman Sachs had a settlement value of about $350 million before the Supreme Court intervened, Bloomberg Intelligen­ce analyst Elliot Stein said.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States