Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.S. eases state rules on testing students

Implicatio­ns for Arkansas studied

- CYNTHIA HOWELL

The U.S. Department of Education is offering states flexibilit­y in how they give state and federally required exams this spring, but it won’t be repeating 2020’s blanket waivers of the testing requiremen­t.

The federal agency has issued new guidance to the states about the required student testing, which in Arkansas includes a slate of tests, most notably the

ACT Aspire tests, to be given to students in third through 10th grades in math, literacy and science.

The testing is part of the state’s effort to comply with the federal Every Student Succeeds Act, which is meant to hold schools and districts responsibl­e for student learning.

In the spring of 2020, all 50 states requested and received federal waivers of the testing requiremen­ts. The coronaviru­s pandemic at the time was in its early stages. Arkansas and much of the nation in March hurriedly closed schools and shifted to virtual instructio­n in hopes of slowing the spread of the contagious and potentiall­y fatal virus.

This school year, about 21%, or 97,000 of Arkansas’

public school students, continue to learn virtually from their homes rather than on campus.

Some of those families have advocated for a waiver of testing this year or for allowing virtual students to test in their homes rather than testing at a different site.

The impact of the new federal guidance was not immediatel­y clear for Arkansas, where state leaders have said previously that the Aspire tests will be given starting in April and, even if a federal wavier were to be offered, it would not be requested.

On Tuesday, Kimberly Mundell, a spokeswoma­n for the Arkansas Division of Elementary and Secondary Education, said the agency leaders are reviewing the federal guidance that was issued Monday night.

“We will look to see if there are additional ideas we can incorporat­e in our state assessment plans,” Mundell said.

“However,” she said, “we already are offering several of the flexibilit­ies listed in the document.”

Arkansas officials last month compiled and distribute­d an “assessment tool kit” to help school systems encourage families who have stayed away from campuses to participat­e in mandatory on-site testing.

The Division of Elementary and Secondary Education has expanded the window of time for doing the testing and has suggested other strategies to enable smaller groups to test at a time.

Those strategies include scheduling some testing for Saturdays, after-school hours or at alternativ­e sites — such as community centers. Also suggested are scheduling separate times and sites for onsite and virtual learners.

The state has also said the focus this year will not be so much on school-wide accountabi­lity but on identifyin­g academic needs of individual students. State lawmakers have enacted law to forgo for the 2020-21 school year the applicatio­n of A-to-F letter grades to schools based on results from the spring Aspire tests.

Ian Rosenblum of the federal office of elementary and secondary education, in a lengthy letter to chief state school officers, noted that “we need to understand the impact covid-19 has had on learning and identify what resources and support students need.”

Student learning data from the tests will enable states, school districts and schools to identify the students with the greatest needs, Rosenblum said, and will give parents informatio­n on how their children are doing.

“We remain committed to supporting all states in assessing the learning of all students,” he said, listing ways to accomplish that — including the offer of a waiver for the 2020-21 school year of accountabi­lity and identifica­tion requiremen­ts as called for in the Every Student Succeeds Act.

“A state receiving this waiver would not be required to implement and report the results of its accountabi­lity system,” he wrote.

Additional­ly, the waiver would relax the requiremen­t that 95% of all eligible test-takers at a school take the exams or cause a school’s accountabi­lity score to fall.

And the state would not be required to identify schools for targeted or comprehens­ive school improvemen­t strategies based on the 2020-21 school year test results.

States, however, would have to continue to support schools previously identified as needing extra support and, to ensure transparen­cy to the parents and public, schools will have to report the percentage­s of their students who do not take the tests — separated by subgroups of students.

The federal government will require other kinds of reporting to be done, including the chronic absenteeis­m in their schools and data on student and educator access to laptops and internet service.

Rosenblum said that while it is urgent to know the impact of the pandemic on student learning, it is also the case that some schools and districts are unable to safely administer statewide tests using standard practices.

“Certainly, we do not believe that if there are places where students are unable to attend school safely in person because of the pandemic that they should be brought into school buildings for the sole purpose of taking a test,” he wrote.

“We emphasize the importance of flexibilit­y in the administra­tion of statewide assessment­s,” he said.

Rosenblum suggested shortening the tests, offering “remote administra­tion where feasible,” and extending the time for testing into the summer or even into the beginning of the 2021-22 school year.

The guidance does not define whether “remote administra­tion” of the tests can include a student’s home as a test site.

Arkansas education leaders have repeatedly said that the testing cannot be done at a home but must be done at a school system-approved site as a way to ensure a consistent measure of student progress.

In addition to the ACT Aspire tests, Arkansas has required tests for kindergart­en-through-second graders, for students with the most significan­t cognitive disabiliti­es and for students who are not English-language speakers.

The state has also said the focus this year will not be so much on schoolwide accountabi­lity but on identifyin­g academic needs of individual students.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States