Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Family Zoom calls not immune to plain old bad behavior

- CAROLYN HAX

DEAR CAROLYN: Since the pandemic started, we’ve had a family Zoom call every week. It’s three siblings and two cousins and spouses, about half men and half women. The men comment how they would never find themselves in some of the strange situations the women find themselves in, and make mean, demeaning jokes about styles, cooking, sometimes weight, etc. It’s almost always by the men about the women, right in front of them. The women are good sports and don’t seem visibly hurt. My spouse and I don’t participat­e, but don’t really say anything either. I sometimes seriously think some of the men are misogynist­s.

Now, I agree, I am wound pretty tight. If I were to say something, I’m sure I’d be told off or get “Oh, we’re just joking.” I have not discussed this with my spouse, since I wouldn’t get much of an opinion. Is this misogyny or am I just being a prude?

— Zoom Family Prude

DEAR READER: “Prude” is misogynist­ic, too. Did you choose that word on purpose?

Either way — it’s the part of your question that points to the answer.

Yes, absolutely, a group of men engaging in gang-ridicule of women over their judgment, style, cooking and weight is misogyny. No question. That you feel you have to confirm with others what your ears are actually hearing only proves how effective such misogyny is. It permeates, undermines, silences. It metastasiz­es into self-doubt.

There’s also no reason to believe it doesn’t seep into men, too, in a different but also insidious way. If you can absorb so much of it without acting, and get to this point in your life without ever reckoning with it fully, then why can’t the same be said of these male family members? Maybe all of you on this call are at finely shaded versions of the same evolutiona­ry point, where a lifetime of misogynist­ic messaging has pushed you onto a group-Zoom-ful of tired, mindless jokes about women’s cooking and backsides, with too much inertia to fix it.

The difference, obviously, is that women clearly lose more — since, with this dynamic, men enjoy a power advantage over women. “Enjoy,” I should say, because crap relationsh­ips with the women in their lives are hardly cause for celebratio­n.

But to declare these men misogynist­s might assign more blame than they’ve earned. If you can become so accustomed to misogyny that you, unwittingl­y, use its vocabulary against yourself and/or aren’t sure of what you’re witnessing, then they, too, can be unwitting participan­ts. These “good sport” women aren’t calling them on it, so who is, in earnest?

If you have the will for it, then you can disrupt the inertia and cultural brainwashi­ng. Not from an us-vs.-them, women-vs.-men angle, but from an us-vs.-stupid angle — with the “us” being your whole family group, and “stupid” being the lifetime of sexist tropes.

So: “Another cooking/ weight joke, really?” And if you get the expected pushback: “Jokes are fine, I just think we’re all ready for new ones.”

A reader wrote this about another column, but it applies here:

When the bully abuses someone, repeat his comments back, ending with a question. This takes some pressure off the person confrontin­g. A profession­al I dealt with called me “Dear.” All it took was one, “Dear?” for him to stop.

— G.

Chat online with Carolyn at 11 a.m. each Friday at washington­post.com. Write to Tell Me About It in care of The Washington Post, Style Plus, 1150 15th St. N.W., Washington, D.C. 20071; or email tellme@washpost.com

 ?? (Washington Post Writers Group/Nick Galifianak­is) ??
(Washington Post Writers Group/Nick Galifianak­is)
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States