Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

U.N.’s gender-equality paper adopted after much debate

- EDITH M. LEDERER

U.N. Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka said areas in the outcome document “do not please everybody,” and the conclusion­s could have been “more ambitious” and the recommenda­tions “even bolder and decisive.”

UNITED NATIONS — A U.N. commission fighting for gender equality called for a sharp increase of women in global decision-making in an intensely debated final document adopted Friday night.

The Commission on the Status of Women reaffirmed the blueprint to achieve gender equality, which was adopted 25 years ago at the Beijing women’s conference, and shone a spotlight on several major issues today, including the imbalance of power between men and women in public life and the growing impact of violence against women and girls in the digital world.

Diplomats were negotiatin­g until almost the last minute over language on women human-rights defenders, gender-based violence, and reproducti­ve and sexual health and rights. Some Western nations sought unsuccessf­ully to get the commission to recognize gender nonconform­ing and transgende­r women. The closest they got was a reference to women and girls “who experience multiple and intersecti­ng forms of discrimina­tion” and face “diverse situations and conditions.”

The European Union said it would have liked to see “more ambitious language” in the 23-page document, stressing that “the systematic attempts by some delegation­s to derail the process and question internatio­nal commitment­s and obligation­s on gender equality show that the pushback against women’s rights continue.”

Shannon Kowalski, director of advocacy and policy for The Internatio­nal Women’s Health Coalition, said at a briefing earlier Friday that this year, “Russia has been very vocal and on the front lines” in pushing “for language that is often regressing and that seeks to deny women and girls … their rights.”

Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Cuba were also vocal opponents on many issues, she said, while China opposed any reference to women human-rights defenders.

“Russia played an exceptiona­lly disruptive role in the negotiatio­ns,” an EU diplomat said. “Today’s low-common-denominato­r result demonstrat­es that a pushback against women’s rights continues at the U.N., and that Russia is doing all it can to undermine progress on the issue.” The diplomat spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivit­y of the private discussion­s.

The “Agreed Conclusion­s” were negotiated by the 193 U.N. member nations and adopted by consensus by the commission’s 45 members at the end of a two-week meeting. The U.N. women’s agency said more than 25,000 members of civil society registered to participat­e in the partly in-person but mainly virtual meeting that saw 200 side events led by member states and more than 700 events by civil society representa­tives.

After Ambassador Mher Margaryan, the commission chair, banged the gavel signifying consensus, about two dozen countries spoke.

Saudi Arabia stressed that any reference to gender “means women and men” and to marriage as “between women and men.” China said it would not join consensus on the role of women human-rights defenders.

U.N. Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka said areas in the outcome document “do not please everybody,” and the conclusion­s could have been “more ambitious” and the recommenda­tions “even bolder and decisive.”

She urged member states to use the recommenda­tions “as a building block and to outperform what is contained in these Agreed Conclusion­s.” She said the upcoming, mainly virtual Gender Equality Forum in Mexico City, another follow-up to the 1995 Beijing conference, “will take forward what we have learned from the discussion­s of this commission and look at how we take concrete actions.”

A highlight of the latest meeting was the virtual appearance by Vice President Kamala Harris, who told the commission that “the status of women is the status of democracy” and that President Joe Biden’s administra­tion will work to improve both.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States