Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Foxconn’s tax breaks face state downsizing

-

MADISON, Wis. — Foxconn Technology Group, the world’s largest electronic­s maker, has reached a new deal with reduced tax breaks for its scaled-back manufactur­ing facility in southeast Wisconsin, Gov. Tony Evers and the company announced Monday.

Details of the new deal were not immediatel­y released. It was scheduled to be approved at a meeting today of the Wisconsin Economic Developmen­t Corp., the state’s top jobs agency that negotiated the initial deal with Foxconn.

The new deal will reduce the potential tax breaks by billions of dollars and still have potential tax breaks worth more than $10 million for the company, said a person with knowledge of the new contract who was not authorized to speak publicly.

The original contract with nearly $4 billion in state and local tax incentives was struck in 2017 by then-Gov. Scott Walker. It was based on Taiwan-based Foxconn’s promise to build a $10 billion flat-screen-panel manufactur­ing facility in Mount Pleasant, near the Illinois border, employing up to 13,000 people.

Then-President Donald Trump heralded the deal as a sign of a revitalize­d American manufactur­ing economy, calling the envisioned plant “transforma­tional” and the “eighth wonder of the world.” He traveled to Wisconsin in 2018 for the groundbrea­king ceremony.

But Foxconn, best known for making Apple iPhones, has continuall­y scaled back its plans for the site and missed employment targets that would trigger state tax credits. The state told Foxconn last year that it would not award it tax credits because the company had made substantia­l changes in its manufactur­ing plans and was out of compliance with the agreement. Foxconn employed 281 people in Wisconsin in 2019, according to the economic developmen­t agency.

Spokesman David Callender said the agency does not comment on its discussion­s “unless and until action has been taken by the board.”

One of the agency’s board members, Democratic Assembly Minority Leader Gordon Hintz, said he was encouraged that both sides had agreed to a deal but he still had questions about the contract he will be voting on at today’s meeting.

“All of us want more transparen­cy and clarity on what’s happening,” Hintz said. “That’s something the company has been dishonest, deceptive and failed on.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States