Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Who’s afraid of a boom?

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics, writes for The New York Times.

“If it rains, we might want to open our umbrellas,” said the Treasury secretary. “Oh, my God, she’s predicting a torrential downpour,” shouted panicked pundits.

That’s not exactly what Janet Yellen said on Tuesday. Her actual words were, “It may be that interest rates will have to rise somewhat to make sure that our economy doesn’t overheat.” Her remark wasn’t a forecast, it certainly wasn’t an attempt to influence the Federal Reserve, and it was simple good sense.

Still, she shouldn’t have said it. Convention says that the nation’s top economic official must avoid uttering even the most obvious economic truths, even if she happens to be a world-class economist, lest they be read as signals of … something. And the financial media rushed to declare her remarks a scandalous deviation from the Biden administra­tion’s official line.

Luckily, the furor was short-lived, and as these things go, Yellen’s moment of honesty wasn’t a big deal. Market expectatio­ns of future monetary policy, as reflected in long-term interest rates, don’t seem to have moved at all in the past couple months.

But the hair-trigger media response was part of a broader phenomenon: Many commentato­rs just don’t seem able to keep any perspectiv­e about the bumps and blips of a booming economy.

There definitely is a boom underway, even if a vast majority of Republican­s claim to believe that the economy is getting worse. All indication­s are that we’re headed for the fastest year of growth since the “Morning in America” boom of 1983-84. What’s not to like?

Well, booming economies often run into temporary bottleneck­s, which show up in surging prices for selected goods. For example, the price of copper tripled between December 2008 and February 2011, even though recovery from the 2008 recession was fairly sluggish.

The bottleneck problem is especially severe now because the pandemic slump was, to use the technical term, weird, and so is the recovery now underway. Consumer spending didn’t follow the patterns it exhibits in a convention­al recession, and we’re now facing unusual disruption­s as a result.

The great lumber shortage is a case in point. Outlays on housing usually plunge in a recession. In 2020, however, with many people stuck at home, Americans splurged on home improvemen­ts. Lumber producers didn’t see that coming and scaled back, leaving them without enough capacity to meet demand. So the price of two-byfours has gone through the (unaffordab­le) roof.

But do such bottleneck­s pose a risk to overall recovery? Do they mean that policymake­rs need to pull back? No. The overwhelmi­ng lesson of the past 15 years or so is that short-term fluctuatio­ns in raw material prices tell you nothing about future inflation, and that policymake­rs that overreact to these fluctuatio­ns—like the European Central Bank, which raised interest rates in the midst of a debt crisis because it was spooked by commodity prices—are always sorry in retrospect.

Raw material shortages, then, aren’t a major problem. What about labor shortages?

Many employers are currently complainin­g that they can’t find enough workers despite widespread joblessnes­s; Federal Reserve officials believe that the true unemployme­nt rate is still close to 10 percent. How seriously should we take these complaints?

I’ve been poring over a report titled “U.S. Small Businesses Struggle to Find Qualified Employees.” The report summarized a survey conducted by Gallup and Wells Fargo, which found a majority of businesses saying that it was hard to hire workers.

Did I mention the date on the report? Feb. 15, 2013—a time when there were three unemployed workers for every job opening. There was in fact no shortage of qualified labor, and the unemployme­nt rate kept falling for another seven years.

So what was that about? Employers in a depressed economy get used to being able to fill vacancies easily. When the economy improves, hiring gets a bit harder; sometimes you have to attract workers by offering higher wages. And employers experience that as a labor shortage.

But that’s how the economy is supposed to work! Employers competing for workers by raising wages isn’t a problem; it’s what we want to see.

Does all of this mean that there are no limits to the economy’s expansion and that inflation can never become a problem? Of course not. But spot shortages of a few goods and a robust market for labor aren’t reasons to panic.

We should get worried only if we see one of two things: evidence that expectatio­ns of continuing inflation are getting embedded in price-setting decisions, and/or evidence that the economy is getting hugely overheated.

So far there’s no evidence for the first potential problem, and the Biden administra­tion is reportedly watching carefully for such evidence.

As for overheatin­g: It could be an issue. We’ve just passed a very large economic relief package, and households are sitting on huge savings. So an excessive boom is possible. But if that happens, the Fed can and, I believe, will tap on the brakes—something I can say because thankfully I’m not a public official.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States