Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Corporate cliches rise with Zoom

- TATUM HUNTER

The first time Grant Thomas heard someone say they were “taking a bio break” was in December while he was freelancin­g at an ad agency.

“It’s a phrase I can smell,” Thomas, an engineer and creative director based in Portland, Ore., wrote in a post on LinkedIn. “Just a nasty term.”

He recalls asking himself: Are people trying to disguise normal, human bathroom breaks as something more productive?

“It makes you sound like a robot or a machine,” says the 37-year-old, who now works as a software architect at developmen­t firm BlueInGree­n. “You’re trying to hide this very natural thing that everyone does behind this slick veneer of profession­alism.”

Thomas says he has heard more of “bio break” as well as other classic corporate phrases like “touch base” and “nice to e-meet you” since the coronaviru­s pandemic forced him and his clients into work-from-home setups.

LITTLE TOLERANCE

During the pandemic, corporate cultures with little tolerance for human foibles like tiredness or forgetfuln­ess gave way to Zoom calls where co-workers gaze right into your cluttered kitchen while your toddler screams in the background. At the same time, workers are juggling more new technology than ever and adjusting to communicat­ing digitally with co-workers they rarely see.

“I’ll circle back” sounds better than “I’ll Slack you later because my water heater broke.” And “I’m out of pocket” has a different ring than “I’m away from my desk because my son wants to show me a dead praying mantis.”

Melissa Jones Briggs, a lecturer in organizati­onal behavior at Stanford Graduate School of Business, says some people use business euphemisms and insider terms as armor against uncertaint­y and embarrassm­ent. Remote and “hybrid” work have brought plenty of both.

“When we’re vulnerable, it’s tempting to use more corporate speak because it distances us and helps us obscure our personal selves,” Briggs said.

CORPORATE SPEAK

Corporate speak isn’t always a bad thing. Profession­s have shared lingo that helps people work together faster. But if Slack, Zoom and email are one layer of separation, corporate speak can be yet another.

Tim Ito and Bob Wiltfong, co-authors of “The BS Dictionary: Uncovering the Origins and True Meanings of Business Speak,” say jargon carries risks.

One is miscommuni­cation: Business jargon that sails over some people’s heads leads to mistakes and poor decisions, Wiltfong said. For instance, “end of day” might mean different things to different employees.

Another is exclusion: Employees rely on language that’s confusing for outsiders because it marks them as insiders, Wiltfong said. While some companies are making verbal commitment­s to more equitable work environmen­ts for people of different background­s, corporate speak works against that goal, he said.

Hybrid work models, with some employees in the office and others at home, call for extra clear communicat­ion, and corporate-speak can lead to “delusion,” Briggs said.

NEW WORK MODELS

But new work models could also present an opportunit­y for corporate types to rethink the way they communicat­e and champion better habits, Wiltfong said. “Over the last year and a half, I think there’s an acknowledg­ment that, whether we like it or not, we have to be more human,” he said.

Ito noted that “hybrid work” is itself corporate-speak.

Some companies are turning to AI to influence employees’ word choice and manage corporate-isms. One AI writing tool called Linguix has seen its user base balloon from about 3,000 to 115,000 since the pandemic began, due to remote work, its co-founder Alex Lashkov said. One client in the IT industry used Linguix to deter its employees from using the word “powerhouse” to describe things, he said.

Demand for another AI assistant, called Writer, which uses machine learning to scan employees’ communicat­ions for words and phrases their companies want to avoid, has shot up during the last year, Chief Executive Officer May Habib said.

Writer counts Twitter and Intuit among its clients and its revenue has doubled since January, she said, without providing specific figures.

Writer’s algorithms draw on natural language processing — complex artificial intelligen­ce that’s “trained” by ingesting written language, which it can then, theoretica­lly, understand and reproduce — to read what employees write and make suggestion­s. The algorithms make way for helpful tools such as automated writing and advanced search. But some models have been criticized for reinforcin­g racial bias.

POINTING OUT THE RISKS

In 2020, a former Google AI researcher claimed she was fired after putting forth research pointing out the risks of certain AI language models and criticizin­g the company’s treatment of minority employees. At the time, Google’s head of AI research said on Twitter the researcher had left after a paper she co-wrote didn’t meet the company’s standards for publicatio­n.

Most companies use Writer to monitor external communicat­ions with customers, but some also use it internally to discourage employees from striking the wrong tone in emails or Slack messages, Habib said. That might mean avoiding passive-aggressive wording, or language the company deems too casual, like “wanna” instead of “want to.” But some clients use Writer’s technology to target business lingo, prodding employees to think twice before they request a “go-forward plan” or threaten to “operationa­lize” something.

“We definitely help folks communicat­e in ways that indicate competence and confidence at work, and overuse of those types of terms really undermines that,” she said, noting that the vast majority of her clients don’t compel their employees to adopt the tool, but some do.

Thomas said he wouldn’t want people — even the bio-break takers — subjected to such AI reminders. But that doesn’t mean we have no choice but to ping, flag, hop on calls and circle back.

People who want more clear, direct and human language in the workplace must start with their own communicat­ion, Briggs said. Before you think about how others see you, think about what they need from you and what your shared objective is. Then, choose words that genuinely help you get there, she advises.

If you’re feeling brave, you can even admit to “using the bathroom.”

“I think everyone would be happier if we could all be more authentic all the time,” Thomas said. “But I think that makes people uncomforta­ble in a different way.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States