Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Plastics!

-

Abill passed earlier this month by the California Legislatur­e would ban manufactur­ers from putting the triangular chasing-arrows symbol, signifying that their plastic products and packaging are recyclable, on items that are not anywhere near recyclable. Although this first-inthe-nation measure didn’t receive much outside attention, the bill deserves to be imposed nationwide in order to halt the widespread and destructiv­e use of the recyclable symbol—along with the overuse of plastics in packaging.

The Environmen­tal Protection Agency says such products wind up being incinerate­d or dumped in landfills regardless of consumers’ good intentions at the recycling bin. Some estimates say only around 8.7 percent of plastics are actually recyclable. When manufactur­ers stamp that triangular symbol on their plastic products, they often are lying to consumers. And there’s nothing accidental about this misinforma­tion: It’s part of a deliberate feel-good campaign by petrochemi­cal companies to make their destructiv­e products seem environmen­tally friendly so consumers will think less of the harm they’re causing to the environmen­t.

Republic Services has an aptly titled website, “Everything You Think You Know About Recycling Is Wrong and Here’s How to Fix It,” that’s well worth a visit.

Deceptivel­y placing the triangular symbol on non-recyclable items adds tremendous­ly to municipal waste-processing costs. Taxpayers must cover the costs of collecting and hauling the plastics along with legitimate recyclable­s to a recycling center, where bogus items must be separated, then hauled over to traditiona­l landfills where they belonged in the first place.

The misplaced chasing-arrows symbols also create a false sense among consumers that they’re doing the right thing. People feel good about being responsibl­e when, in fact, they’re making a big problem even worse. They should be complainin­g loudly to product manufactur­ers about mislabelin­g and putting way too much useless plastic into their packaging.

For example, consider a small camping knife or multitool delivered by Amazon in a box padded with unrecyclab­le plastic bubble wrap. The product itself requires only about 6 square inches of packaging, but the manufactur­er often insists on wrapping it in 10 or 12 square inches of hard-to-open, heavy plastic to cover its big marketing label. Is all that plastic waste really necessary?

The short answer is no. And before tossing it in the bin, consumers owe it to their planet to make sure it really is recyclable.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States