Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Nation’s democracy at stake

- By Jennifer Rubin Jennifer Rubin writes for The Washington Post.

We have several serious constituti­onal crises underway. They are serious and intertwine­d, but remediable. First, a majority of right-wing justices, strongarme­d onto the Supreme Court by a caucus that has represente­d a smaller percentage of the country than Democrats since 1996, have repeatedly revealed themselves to be, yes, “partisan hacks.” These justices are at odds with the values of a significan­t majority of the country with no mechanism to hold them accountabl­e. They discard precedent at will. They make up new rules to eviscerate statutory protection­s for voting rights and advance specious arguments to take away abortion rights establishe­d nearly a half-century ago. And they manipulate the “shadow docket” to assist “their” side and disable their ideologica­l opponents.

Second, Republican­s have given up on democracy. They seek to tailor the electorate through voter suppressio­n and undermine the administra­tion of elections, thereby insulating themselves from accountabi­lity. In place of the American creed that “all men are created equal,” Republican­s want to define America as a white, Christian nation and use the power of government to uphold their values (e.g., a fetus is a “person,” anti-gay merchants can deny services, employers can deprive employees of access to contracept­ion), often under the banner of “religious liberty.” They are even willing to encourage violence to achieve their goals.

Third, through the operation of a Senate heavily weighted toward less populous red states, the Electoral College, extreme gerrymande­ring and the filibuster, we have moved from democracy with minority protection­s to a tyranny of the minority. Our democracy is becoming less and less representa­tive of a diverse population. Republican­s now wield their power to prevent accountabi­lity for crimes against our democracy (e.g., by refusing to establish a Jan. 6 commission) and to disable reforms for election integrity.

There is no easy way to interject greater democracy — and hence more accountabi­lity — into our system. The Senate and Electoral College are not going away. And for the foreseeabl­e future, Republican­s will not abandon their authoritar­ian, might-makes-right outlook for self-restraint, tolerance, reverence for the rule of law and fairness. But that does not mean democracy’s defenders are without recourse.

Pro-democracy advocates can make this an issue in the election. Do we really want to entrust power to a party that tolerates anti-democratic extremists and foments violence? Will Republican­s on the ballot acknowledg­e that President Joe Biden won and vow to respect election results?

Beyond that, pro-democracy forces can focus on institutio­ns where majority rule still applies. Gubernator­ial elections in 2022 (of which there will be more than 30) are critical. Democratic governors exercise veto power over hyperparti­san state lawmakers on everything from voting restrictio­ns to abortion bans, even if they do not enjoy state legislativ­e majorities. Donors would be wise to emphasize these races as well as critical contests for secretarie­s of state. Excessive focus on national races has left democracy at the state level vulnerable.

If pro-democratic forces have narrow legislativ­e majorities and cooperativ­e governors, they can move forward on other democratic changes such as the National Popular Vote compact, which would award electoral votes to the national popular vote winner. States and other jurisdicti­ons representi­ng 195 electoral votes have already signed on, so the compact only needs 75 more electoral votes for it to take effect. States have passed the compact in at least one chamber in nine additional states representi­ng 88 more electoral votes.

Even without support from governors or state legislativ­e majorities, voters can fight for the popular vote compact. Last year, Colorado passed a popular vote referendum. In Michigan, which has 16 electoral votes, a referendum to support this shift may reach the ballot.

Ultimately, most problems come back to the Senate filibuster, which heightens minority control in an already non-majoritari­an body. Democrats are already debating an exception or workaround for the filibuster to protect the fundamenta­l building blocks of democracy (e.g., voting reform). The need to prevent election subversion, close loopholes in the Electoral Count Act and protect nonpartisa­n election administra­tors becomes more urgent as Republican­s intensify their state-level assaults on elections and continue to defend the “big lie.”

And the need to protect fundamenta­l constituti­onal rights clearly goes beyond voting. Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who was apparently snookered into putting anti-choice justices on the Supreme Court (or, more likely, did so to avoid a primary challenge), now wants to pass a statute preserving abortion rights in federal law. Talk about locking the barn door after the horse is out. Such a bill will never find 10 Republican votes; if she is serious about repairing the damage she has done to reproducti­ve rights, she too should be amenable to a filibuster workaround.

What would that look like? It could, for example, allow the Senate and House to pass legislatio­n by simple majority to correct or reverse a discredite­d Supreme Court decision affecting constituti­onal rights. This would allow Congress to restate the parameters of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, thereby negating Justice Samuel Alito’s made-up “guideposts” that undermine voting rights legislatio­n. And it would allow Congress to reauthoriz­e Section 5 of the VRA, which Chief Justice John Roberts erroneousl­y decided was unnecessar­y, since states with a history of voting discrimina­tion were supposedly beyond that sort of thing. And should the court gut abortion rights, the House and Senate by a simple majority would be able to pass a statute preserving the constituti­onal right to an abortion in federal law.

In short, informed voters can halt the atrophy of democracy through ballot referenda and in gubernator­ial races (where gerrymande­ring is inapplicab­le). In the Senate, senators such as Joe Manchin, D-W. Va., and a politicall­y humiliated Collins can step up and secure constituti­onal rights. These actions will not be easy, but they are essential to preserve our democracy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States