Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Science is an instrument through which God acts

- PAUL PRATHER Paul Prather is pastor of Bethesda Church near Mount Sterling, Ky.You can email him at pratpd@yahoo.com

I’ve been an evangelica­l Christian all my life, with the exception of my exuberantl­y misspent teenage years and early 20s.

Raised a Southern Baptist, the son of a Baptist preacher and a Sunday School teacher who hauled me to church three times a week, I later converted as a young adult, along with my parents and sister, to the even more enthusiast­ic charismati­c/Pentecosta­l movement. I’ve been an ordained minister in that tradition 40 years.

I buy into all — OK, not all, but nearly all — of evangelica­lism’s core tenets. I believe I’m saved by grace through faith in Jesus. I believe the Bible is the inspired word of God. I believe in sharing my faith (something I’m doing at this minute). Heck, as I demonstrat­ed in my 1996 book “Modern-Day Miracles,” I even believe in divine healing, prophecy and, yes, speaking in tongues.

Despite all that, from childhood I’ve felt out of sync with my own people. I believe in God and the Bible and miracles, but I also trust science and secular experts. To me, those things don’t necessaril­y cancel each other.

I felt my old discomfort flare up again when I read about the recent death of Marcus Lamb, 64, a bigtime televangel­ist killed by covid-19.

Lamb led his global Christian TV network, Daystar, “in spreading inaccurate informatio­n about coronaviru­s vaccines and instead promoting treatments that are not proven remedies,” wrote religion reporter Michelle Boorstein. [LINK: tinyurl.com/4u559jrj]

Lamb’s milieu was “a deep base of politics, conspirato­rial thinking and a skepticism of anything that appears secular. And that makes frank discussion of Daystar’s activism against vaccines, even in the face of death, unlikely.”

The pandemic has brought evangelica­ls’ anti-science, conspirato­rial thinking into fresh relief, but there’s nothing new about it.

It dates at least to the 1925 Scopes monkey trial over the teaching of evolution in public schools. Historians of religion mark this as a turning point. The Scopes debacle left a rancid taste in the mouths of evangelica­ls and their ultra-conservati­ve cousins, fundamenta­lists, that has never abated.

Those earlier evangelica­ls and fundamenta­lists felt the national press and other wiseacre elites had intentiona­lly, almost sadistical­ly, abused them during the Scopes trial.

The arrest of John Scopes for teaching evolution was planned by civic boosters of Dayton, Tenn., in a misguided but good-natured attempt to promote the town, historian Garry Wills has written. Scopes volunteere­d to be the defendant, even though it wasn’t clear to anybody, including him, that he’d actually taught evolution.

In the evangelica­l view, secularist­s seized on this non-event as an opportunit­y to lampoon and discredit low-church Christians and wildly misreprese­nt their beliefs. (I’ve read a bit of the Scopes coverage, including that of influentia­l newspaper columnist H.L. Mencken. It truly was reprehensi­ble.)

Scalded by the experience, evangelica­ls withdrew into what commonly has been called the “evangelica­l ghetto,” where they nursed their wounds and preached to each other in an echo chamber. Some devolved into conspiracy theories. A hostility toward secular authoritie­s and many things scientific has festered for a century. Thanks a lot, Mencken.

Some came to suspect the government was secretly controlled by communist atheists. Some obsessed over progressiv­e denominati­ons that didn’t share their theology. Some saw an ongoing media campaign against them. Others decided barcodes foretold the Antichrist’s rise.

Everything rose from a nefarious plot. Nothing was what it appeared on the surface. This sort of thinking feeds on itself.

Then came covid-19. Evangelica­ls have proved the most hostile of skeptics toward the disease, vaccines and public health efforts.

It’s odd, kind of. Evangelica­ls historical­ly have embraced technologi­es and products created by science. They were pioneers in their use of radio, TV, cable, communicat­ion satellites and the internet. When they have headaches, they take ibuprofen.

But now, when science might save their lives, a disproport­ionate number dismiss it as a deception from the devil or a plot by unbeliever­s, or both.

This is simultaneo­usly tragic and infuriatin­g. Even after all these years, it still won’t compute in my head.

Of course, I’m not the only evangelica­l who feels that way, thank God. There’s a terrific website called BioLogos, founded by evangelica­l and renowned geneticist Francis Collins, who led the Human Genome Project. [LINK: biologos.org/] BioLogos explores the complement­ary roles played by science and faith.

BioLogos’ president, Deborah Haarsma, an astrophysi­cist with a doctorate from MIT, declares in one website article that Christ gives us hope, but science equips us to act.

Elsewhere, she says God both inspired the Bible and created the universe. The natural laws by which the universe works — the subjects of science — reflect God’s mind.

The folks at BioLogos don’t see science as a threat, then, but as a blessing, even when the truths it reveals sometimes appear to contradict their theology.

I agree. I believe in the Lord and simultaneo­usly believe in vaccines and the methods scientists employ to develop them. Just because science did it doesn’t mean God wasn’t behind it. Science can be one way the Lord relieves us from suffering.

Sometimes science is the miracle.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States