Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Sources: Covid asylum curb to end

Decision soon, Biden says; border preparing for surge

- COLLEEN LONG, JASON DEAREN AND ELLIOT SPAGAT Informatio­n for this article was contribute­d by Zeke Miller, Garance Burke, Michael Balsamo, Nomaan Merchant and Farnoush Amiri of The Associated Press.

WASHINGTON — The Biden administra­tion is expected to end the asylum limits at the U.S.-Mexico border by May 23 that were put in place to prevent the spread of covid-19, according to people familiar with the matter.

The decision would halt use of public health powers to absolve the United States of obligation­s under American law and internatio­nal treaty to provide haven to people fleeing persecutio­n, and would apply to all asylum-seekers.

Ending the limitation­s in May would allow for time to prepare at the border, the people said.

It also raises the possibilit­y that more asylum-seeking migrants will come to the border at a time when flows are high. The Department of Homeland Security said Tuesday that about 7,100 migrants were coming daily, compared with an average of about 5,900 a day in February and on pace to match or exceed highs from last year, 2019 and other peak periods.

President Joe Biden declined to discuss his administra­tion’s plans, telling reporters Wednesday at the White House, “We’ll have a decision on that soon.”

Whenever the limits are lifted, his communicat­ions director said “there will be an influx of people to the border. We are doing a lot of work to plan for that contingenc­y.” Speaking broadly, Kate Bedingfiel­d said the administra­tion is trying to “build up our migration system and ensure that we are restoring order at the border.”

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention had extended its asylum-blocking powers for two months in late January, near the height of the omicron variant. The authority is up for renewal this week, and officials were expected to announce as early as Friday that it would be terminated, giving border authoritie­s a few months to prepare for the coming deadline.

The people familiar with the plans saw a draft report that has not been finalized and they spoke to reporters.

The limits went into place in March 2020 under the Trump administra­tion. While officials said at the time that it was a way to keep covid-19 out of the United States, there always has been criticism that the restrictio­ns were used as an excuse to seal the border to migrants unwanted by then-President Donald Trump.

The health order has caused migrants to be expelled from the United States more than 1.7 million times since March 2020 without a chance for them to request asylum.

And restrictio­ns took effect over the objections of CDC officials, and Dr. Martin Cetron of the Division of Migration and Quarantine refused the order to begin its use. He said there was no public health basis for such a drastic move, The Associated Press reported. But then-Vice President Mike Pence ordered the CDC’s director to use the agency’s emergency powers and it went into effect.

Homeland Security officials, Senate Majority Leader Charles Schumer of New York and other top Democrats were increasing­ly vocal about wanting to end so-called Title 42 authority.

Not all Democratic elected officials agreed. Sens. Mark Kelly and Kyrsten Sinema, both Arizona Democrats, sided with Republican leaders to say Title 42 should remain until U.S. border authoritie­s were prepared for sharp increases in new arrivals.

Homeland Security officials said they are planning for as many as 18,000 arrivals daily, a number that they cautioned was to prepare for all possible outcomes, not projection­s.

Critics say Title 42 has been an excuse to avoid asylum obligation­s under U.S. law and internatio­nal treaty, buying Biden time to create the “humane” asylum system that he promised during his 2020 campaign.

“Title 42 is a horrific and unjustifie­d policy that should never have been enacted and has caused grave harm to thousands of asylum-seekers over the past two years,” said immigratio­n attorney Lee Gelernt of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Covid-19 test results from several major corridors for illegal border crossings suggest it is well below levels that have triggered concerns among U.S. officials.

In California, 54 of 2,877 migrants tested positive in the first two weeks of March, according to the state Department of Social Services. That’s a rate of just 1.9%, down from a peak of 28.2% on Jan. 8.

In Pima County, Ariz., which includes Tucson, the seven-day positivity rate among migrants didn’t exceed 1.3% in early March. The positivity rate among 5,300 migrants tested last month at the Regional Center for Border Health near Yuma, Ariz., was 0.1%.

McAllen, Texas, the largest city in the busiest corridor for illegal crossings, has a higher rate among migrants — 11.3% for the week ending March 16 — but it has been consistent­ly lower than the general population.

 ?? (AP/Mariam Zuhaib) ?? Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, attends a news conference about the U.S. southern border on Wednesday in Washington.
(AP/Mariam Zuhaib) Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio, attends a news conference about the U.S. southern border on Wednesday in Washington.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States