Spending us into poverty
Ihave been writing for years about how progressive policies championed by the Democratic Party and served up under the guise of caring about low-income Americans wind up hurting those very communities.
The latest chapter in this saga is the newly unleashed round of inflation, the worst our country has seen in 40 years.
Two important points here are that first, we can lay responsibility for this inflation directly at the doorstep of the Biden administration, and second, those being hurt most by this inflation are the very low-income Americans that this administration claims to care so much about.
A recent report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis focuses on the disparate impact of inflation on different communities, causing the most damage to low-income Americans.
According to the report, although one number for inflation is reported nationally, different households do not equally take the brunt of this.
A Gallup survey from late 2021 reveals that 45.5 percent of all Americans reported experiencing “severe” or “moderate” hardship caused by inflation.
However, the story changes dramatically when broken down by income. Among those with incomes of less than $40,000, 70.7 percent say they are experiencing “severe” or “moderate” hardship. And 46.5 percent of those earning from $40,000 to $99,999 and 28.3 percent of those earning $100,000 or above reported experiencing “severe” or “moderate” hardship.
The report offers various explanations about why inflation hits lower-income households harder. These include the fact that lower-income households have a lower percentage of interest-bearing assets, meaning their world is mostly cash. Inflation takes its highest toll on cash.
Higher-income households have more flexibility in adjusting behavior than do lower-income households. Lower-income households tend to be renters rather than homeowners, and rent is more volatile in an inflationary environment.
The tragedy is that inflation is not a surprise attack. We know that inflation is caused by pouring excessive money into the economy. If today an apple costs $1, and tomorrow the government prints another dollar without producing another apple, the price of an apple will jump to $2.
Economists were widely reporting that the Biden administration was spending too much money and that this profligate spending was being enabled by the Federal Reserve.
Harvard economist and former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers wrote in The Washington Post last May: “The inflation risk is real,” noting that the problem is “overheating, and not excessive slack.”
This in the wake of the Biden administration’s $1.9 trillion relief spending and the beginning of trying to pass the $4 trillion Build Back Better program, stopped by the courageous renegade senator from West Virginia, Joe Manchin.
Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve, under the leadership of chairman Jerome Powell, in its statement at the end of last April, was still predicting 2 percent inflation and calling the current jump in prices “transitory.”
In July 2021, economists Steve Hanke of Johns Hopkins University and John Greenwood of Invesco predicted in The Wall Street Journal that “By the end of the year, the year-over-year inflation rate will be at least 6 percent and possibly as high as 9 percent.” It reached 7.9 percent.
Yet in November, President Joe Biden renominated Powell to a second term as Federal Reserve chairman, despite his gross mismanagement that led to the inflation we are now experiencing. Biden, in his statement, praised Powell for his “decisive action” and “steady leadership.”
Low-income Americans trying to stay above water in this new flood of inflation are probably less grateful to Biden and Powell for this socalled leadership.