Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Sellout culture and golf

- Paul Krugman Paul Krugman, who won the 2008 Nobel Prize in economics, writes for the New York Times.

Even if you don’t play or follow golf—I don’t—you’re probably aware of the controvers­y engulfing the game. A number of the world’s top-ranked pro players, notably Phil Mickelson, made extremely lucrative deals to play in a new tour, the LIV Golf Internatio­nal Series, sponsored by Saudi Arabia.

The PGA Tour, which has traditiona­lly dominated the sport, responded by suspending 17 of these players.

The Saudis are obviously engaged in rep-utation-laundering—greenswash­ing?—in an attempt to make people forget about the atrocities their regime has perpetrate­d. It’s less clear what motivated the PGA. Did it consider the LIV series flawed, not a proper golf tour? Was it attempting to squash competitio­n? Or was the problem with the LIV series’ sponsors?

PGA attendees surveyed by ProGolf weekly were in no doubt: An overwhelmi­ng majority attributed Mickelson’s exclusion to “media/cancel culture.” And I hope they’re right. If getting paid big bucks to provide favorable PR to a regime that deals with critical journalist­s by killing them and dismemberi­ng them with a bone saw doesn’t warrant cancellati­on, what does? Yet Mickelson and others were willing to provide that PR.

The real story here isn’t that the

PGA may (or may not) have found a line it won’t cross. It is that so many members of the American elite evidently have no such lines.

The rise of cancel culture seems much less important and ominous than the rise of sellout culture. More and more people at the top of our social hierarchy appear willing to do anything for anyone as long as the money is good enough.

This isn’t a purely partisan issue, although sellout culture may be more prevalent on the right than the left. It remains extraordin­ary, given Donald Trump’s bellowing about America First, how many members of his inner circle—including Michael Flynn, his national security adviser, and Rudy Giuliani, his personal lawyer—have been credibly accused of, in some cases have been convicted of, or even confessed to serving as paid agents of despotic foreign government­s.

And even before Trump left office, both his son-in-law and his Treasury secretary were courting Middle Eastern investors, with both soon receiving huge sums from the Saudis and other Gulf government­s.

But it’s not a purely partisan thing. On Sunday, the president of the middle-of-the-road (and highly influentia­l) Brookings Institutio­n resigned in the face of an FBI investigat­ion into whether he illegally lobbied for Qatar.

Although selling out to foreign government­s has special legal status—failure to disclose your role as a paid foreign agent is a crime—it’s not clear that it’s morally any worse than selling out to dubious domestic interests.

My heart sank last fall when cryptocurr­ency-exchange company Crypto.com began running an ad starring famously liberal actor Matt Damon. Maybe Damon didn’t know much about crypto and the extreme skepticism many analysts have about what purpose it serves; he was hired to play a role. (Larry David made an ad for another crypto firm that ran during the Super Bowl.)

But by playing that role, he helped promote what looks more than ever like a pump-and-dump scheme; cryptocurr­encies have lost more than $1.6 trillion in value since that ad began running.

But wasn’t it ever thus? Haven’t people been cashing in on power and celebrity since the dawn of civilizati­on? Yes, but I don’t think I’m idealizing the past by suggesting that there used to be more restraint, more opprobrium associated with selling out too obviously.

Consider the fact that it was regarded as shocking at the time when Gerald Ford got rich, post-presidency, with paid speeches, seats on corporate boards and so on.

Full disclosure: I sometimes give paid speeches within the limits set by The New York Times rules. But I try, not always successful­ly, to be sure that the sponsors aren’t bad guys, and don’t do paid advocacy—which is, coming back to golf, exactly what Mickelson & Co. were effectivel­y doing when they signed on to play for the Bone Saw Tour.

What explains the rise of sellout culture? Tax cuts may have played a role: Selling your soul becomes more attractive when you get to keep more of the proceeds. Soaring income inequality may inspire envy, a desire to keep up with the super-elite. And there is surely a process of normalizat­ion: Everyone else is selling out, so why shouldn’t I join the party?

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States