Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Specious medical claims

-

U.S. Senate candidate Mehmet Oz has, rightfully, hammered his Democratic opponent, Lt. Gov. John Fetterman, for a lack of transparen­cy about his health following a serious stroke. To his credit, Oz released his medical records, after a Post-Gazette editorial urged both candidates to do so. Fetterman has not.

But the celebrity doctor also has questions he needs to answer concerning the health claims he made to his millions of viewers. On his long-running television show, Oz enthusiast­ically promoted cures and remedies that either lacked scientific evidence, or had been proven ineffectiv­e.

Voters deserve to know whether a candidate unabashedl­y used his celebrity to enrich himself. They should know how—and to what extent—Oz profited from the claims he made.

Oz has said his enthusiasm for everything from green coffee bean extract for weight loss to the rare element selenium for cancer prevention—both debunked—came from a desire to give his viewers hope. But of what ultimate benefit are false promises and empty hopes to desperate people? And to what extent did Oz know he was making spurious claims?

Like any federal candidate, Oz submitted a financial disclosure when he entered the race. Last year, his primary income came from three sources, all associated with his television show and controlled all or in part by him and his wife, Lisa.

Those disclosure­s, however, don’t show where his companies got their money, or whether companies that produced the supplement­s and other products he hawked paid any of his companies for the privilege. Transparen­cy about whether Oz personally profited from the hopes he engendered speaks to his integrity, just as transparen­cy about Fetterman’s health does to his.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States