Arkansas Democrat-Gazette

Restoratio­n of debt forgivenes­s sought

U.S. to ask high court to intervene

- COLLIN BINKLEY

WASHINGTON — The Biden administra­tion plans to ask the Supreme Court to reinstate the president’s student debt cancellati­on plan, according to a Thursday legal filing warning that Americans will face financial strain if the plan remains stalled in court when loan payments are scheduled to restart in January.

The Justice Department is fighting to keep Biden’s plan alive after it was halted by two federal courts in recent weeks. On Thursday it asked a federal appeals court in New Orleans to suspend a decision striking down Biden’s plan, and in the same filing it announced plans to ask the Supreme Court to overturn a St. Louis appeals court that halted the plan.

Biden’s plan promises $10,000 in federal student debt forgivenes­s to those with incomes of less than $125,000, or households earning less than $250,000. Pell Grant recipients, who typically demonstrat­e more financial need, are eligible for an additional $10,000 in relief.

Keeping the debt relief on hold would leave the government with an “unnecessar­ily perilous choice,” the administra­tion argued in its filing Thursday. If it restarts student loan payments as planned on Jan. 1, millions of Americans will get billed for debt that was promised to be canceled.

But if the government extends the payment pause, it will cost billions of dollars in lost revenue.

It builds on arguments the administra­tion made in other filings this week, warning that many Americans won’t be able to pay their student debt bills in January if the cancellati­on plan remains halted.

For typical borrowers, monthly payments would be $200 to $300 higher than they would be if Biden’s plan goes through, the Education Department said. The strain could lead to soaring default rates, which have increased by an average of twentyfold in the wake of other natural disasters.

“We anticipate there could be an historical­ly large increase in the amount of federal student loan delinquenc­y and defaults as a result of the covid-19 pandemic,” Education Undersecre­tary James Kvaal said in a Tuesday filing. “This could result in one of the harms that the one-time student loan debt relief program was intended to avoid.”

Biden’s plan has drawn a flurry of legal challenges, which have seen mixed results. Opponents of debt forgivenes­s have asked the Supreme Court to intervene at least twice after their cases failed in lower courts. The Supreme Court rejected both requests.

In its new filing, the Justice Department asks an appeals court to lift a decision from U.S. District Court Judge Mark Pittman striking down Biden’s plan. Pittman, who was appointed by former President Donald Trump and is based in Fort Worth, Texas, ruled last week that Biden’s plan oversteps his presidenti­al authority and usurps Congress’ powers to make laws.

It stemmed from a lawsuit brought by two borrowers who are not eligible for relief under the parameters of Biden’s plan. The program was separately halted by a St. Louis court after six Republican-led states said it would harm financial institutio­ns.

Almost 26 million people already have applied for the relief, with 16 million approved, but the Education Department stopped accepting and processing applicatio­ns last week after the plan was ruled illegal.

The White House says it will prevail in court, but the barrage of lawsuits has thrown Biden’s plan into jeopardy. It’s now uncertain whether 40 million borrowers who were promised debt relief will have to start making payments on that debt in January.

The biggest risk is for 18 million borrowers who were told their entire loan balance would be canceled. Even if payments restart, those borrowers might think they’re in the clear and ignore the bills, the Education Department has warned.

Borrowers who fall behind on payments can face heavy consequenc­es, including damage to their credit scores and the withholdin­g of wages and tax refunds.

Advocates and some Democrats in Congress are pressuring Biden to extend the payment pause until all legal challenges are resolved, despite his previous assurance that the freeze would end after Dec. 31.

In a Tuesday filing, the Education Department said it’s “examining all available options.” But it warned that extending the pause could cost the federal government “several billion dollars a month in unrecovere­d loan revenue.”

The freeze already has cost the federal government more than $100 billion in revenue, according to a July report by the Government Accountabi­lity Office. Critics caution that another extension could worsen inflation and increase the risk of economic recession.

It’s now uncertain whether 40 million borrowers who were promised debt relief will have to start making payments on that debt in January.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United States